President Barack Obama looks at the Chevrolet Volt

As I’ve just before, this whole trend and push to make cars more economical has resulted in a decrease in driving fun. But at the same time, it’s inevitable since times are changing. For example, a research poll conducted by Opinion Research Corp. and commissioned by the Consumer Federation of America showed that 62% of Americans support Obama’s mandate requiring manufacturers to meet a 60 mpg standard by 2025. The survey was based on 2,000 Americans with a margin of error of minus-plus two percentage points.

“Rising gas prices nationwide have ratcheted up support for stricter standards and electric and hybrid vehicles,” said Mark Cooper, research director for the Consumer Federation of America, “The average household is expected to spend more than $3,000 on gasoline this year, compared with just under $2,000 in 2009.”

As a result, manufacturers have been resorting to introducing electric vehicles, which is not news to us. But they’re not going to be as prominent as their sales suggest since it’s estimated that electric and hybrid powertrained cars are only expected to make up less than 10% of sales in the US car industry through 2016, according to J.D. Power and Associates.

However, two-thirds of Americans also think that state governments should remain responsible for setting vehicle emissions standards instead of one federal standard.

To me, receiving this kind of information makes me ponder some questions. Is the enthusiast crowd really shrinking to such an extent that manufacturers no longer see a major market in it? Because lets face it, in order for cars to be more economical, they need to sacrifice performance and well, that kills the fun, especially since cars are becoming heavier and bigger. And if a supposed percentage of the population supports the fuel economy mandate, well, it sounds like our kind are slowly falling off the face of the Earth. At the same, 2000 Americans is a minute number compared to the mass population that is able to buy a car. Maybe I’m just stuck with a conservative mindset and don’t want to accept the fact that times are changing.

- By: Chris Chin

Source: Detroit News


Share |  Email  Print |

Tags: , , , , , , ,





Subscribe & Connect

Connect with us on any of our social profiles below.

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter to receive updates.

  • Matt

    Sure we all want 60 MPG’s but at what cost? I’m not ready to join the EV/Hybrid crowd because I don’t want to own one of these ‘white elephants’ that nobody will want to buy with 80k miles knowing that the battery warranty is only good for 100k miles. 
    I’m also not willing to be “married” to any dealer when you buy one. Who else but your dealer will want to work on these EV/Hybrid vehicles? Hence ya “married” to the dealer…..capisci? 

  • desertwind

    America has always been about choice.  Allow people to choose whatever mpg standard they want by mandating different annual car fees based on car (domestic/foreign), car weight, engine size, engine power, annual mileage, carbon output.  So, for example, a car like the Vette ZR1 would have an annual fee 20 times more than a Honda Fit/Jazz. 
    This is not a sales tax which happens once when a car is sold the first time.
    Nor is it a road tax. Nor is it a gasoline tax.
    Not easy, but fully possible.