Gallery - 5 images
  • Review: 2011 Honda CR-Z Hybrid
  • Review: 2011 Honda CR-Z Hybrid
  • Review: 2011 Honda CR-Z Hybrid
  • Review: 2011 Honda CR-Z Hybrid
  • Review: 2011 Honda CR-Z Hybrid

Review: 2011 Honda CR-Z Hybrid

Hybrids tend to occupy vehicle bodies that are, for lack of better words, awkward and unstylish. Honda’s hybrid designers showed us that this likely always true with the design of the first and second-generation Insight. But the Japanese automaker is here to prove us wrong and show us that hybrid and ugly don’t always have to go hand-in-hand. Meet the 2011 CR-Z Hybrid – the first hybrid vehicle designed to entice a more spirited driver, as it is offered with a 6-speed manual transmission and a very sport design that is sure to attract the attention of performance enthusiasts.

The silhouette of the 2011 Honda CR-Z is reminiscent of Honda’s much celebrated CR-X sport coupe in design and proportion, but with the underpinnings and powertrain are taken from Honda Insight.  The questions remain however, which of these cars does the CR-Z try to emulate, and does it perform as good as it looks?

2011 Honda CR-Z Hybrid Specifications:

  • Base Price: $19,345.
  • Price as Tested: $23,310.
  • Engine: 1.5 liter 4-cylinder i-VTEC, Honda IMA electric-motor - 122-hp / 128 lb-ft.
  • Transmission: 6-speed manual; 6-speed automatic.
  • Curb Weight: 2,637 lbs.
  • 0 to 60 mph: 9 seconds.
  • Top Speed: 122 mph.
  • Fuel-economy (city/highway): 31/37 mpg w/ 6-speed manual; 35/39 mpg w/ CVT.

All Photos Copyright © 2011 Omar Rana, Nikolina Kostrevski - egmCarTech.

Review: 2011 Honda CR-Z Hybrid

Exterior:

From no angle does the 2011 Honda CR-Z emanate your typical hybrid design.  The sporty 2-passenger coupe shares structural architecture with Honda’s Fit and Insight, but is ultimately smaller than it’s platform relatives, measuring in at 160.6 inches long, 68.5 inches wide, and 54.9 inches tall.

The secret behind the ultra-sporty look is what Honda calls the ‘One-motion Wedge’ concept, which features an elongated and lowered hood-line coupled with a widened stance, all of which combines for the sleek nature of the vehicle’s body.  Taking a design cue from the original ‘84 Honda CR-X, the rear of the car features Honda’s signature split-level glass hatch.  While the split hatch offers a great look, it hinders the driver’s visibility.

There is a little doubt that Honda has succeeded in demonstrating that hybrids can in fact be attractive, and not relegated to the ‘eyesore’ category.  The company has effectively shown that hybrids can be exciting, aggressive, and bold; aesthetically, this car definitely makes a statement without being shaped like a cheese wedge.

Review: 2011 Honda CR-Z Hybrid

Interior:

Like the original CR-X and Insight, the 2011 Honda CR-Z is a two passenger car; definitely not a family vehicle. It does differ from the above however, and most other hybrids for that matter, in that it features an exciting interior with textured black materials and aluminum-style accents.

The upper portion of the dash engulfs the cabin, creating a decidedly cockpit feel, and the high-quality silver mesh sport seats provide excellent support, even for the larger driver. The most dazzling interior design element however, is the bright instrument panel mounted right behind the steering wheel; it sports a vibrant blue color pallet and three dimensional imaging, which combine for a multi-layered interface.

The interior build-quality is noteworthy, especially for a relatively affordable car. This is one area Honda has been struggling a bit with as of late, but Honda CR-Z has not fallen victim to the inconsistent nature of recent Honda interiors.

The rear-space in the cabin is well-utilized, as Honda has outfitted a large, two-compartment cargo console just behind the seats, offering a hidden storage space for your laptop, iPad, or any other on-the-go items one might carry. Nonetheless, the 2011 Honda CR-Z sports a mere maximum 25.1 cu-ft of cargo space.

The interior build-quality is noteworthy, especially for a relatively affordable car.

Depending on the trim model, the Honda CR-Z can offer some premium amenities, such as Bluetooth HandsFreeLink. Honda gave as a CR-Z EX to test for a week, and that came with a 360-watt AM/FM/CD high-powered audio system that featured seven speakers (including a subwoofer), Bluetooth HandsFreeLink, perforated leather-wrapped steering-wheel and shift knob, and Honda’s Satellite-Linked Navigation with voice recognition.

One thing this interior does really well is offer a visually engaging experience and versatile approach to interior space utilization that puts the driver front and center.  To the left of the steering wheel sits a cluster of controls which allow the driver to change driving mode (Econ, Normal, Sport), activate traction control, and adjust the side-view mirrors.  Climate, audi, and navigation controls are all housed in the center console which sits tilted toward the driver, effectuating convenient access. All of this puts the driver in close control of his instruments, while leaving the passenger seat open, spacious, and clutter-free.

Review: 2011 Honda CR-Z Hybrid

Performance:

The exterior and interior designs of the Honda CR-Z wet your appetite for performance.  Well, that’s where things get a little less exciting and that’s due to the lack of a turbo gasoline engine, something Honda enthusiasts are very much passionate about. However, we have to say, as a hybrid, the Honda CR-Z does have a little devilish side.

Even considering the hybrid nature of the powertrain, we can’t totally label the car as lacking a sporty factor.

As mentioned above, this car is powered by a similar gasoline-electric hybrid powertrain as the Insight, which means it carries the same 1.5L 4-cylinder, 16-valve i-VTEC gas engine and 10-kilowatt Nickel Metal Hydride battery pack.  That makes for an output of 122-hp at 6,000 rpm and maximum torque of 128 lb-ft at 1,000 rpm when mated to the 6-speed manual.  The CVT equipped models get 123 lb-ft between 1,000 and 2,000 rpm.  That output gives the Honda CR-Z the ability to go from 0 to 60 mph in a tacit 9 seconds, and a top speed of 122 mph.

Even considering the hybrid nature of the powertrain, we can’t totally label the car as lacking a sporty factor.  There is a lot to be said about it being the first ever hybrid to be offered with a 6-speed manual, as well as the variable drive modes mentioned above.  When engaged in ‘Sport’ mode, much of the driving experience becomes enhanced; the engine throttle becomes more responsive, the steering firms up, and on the CVT equipped models, the transmission ratios are optimized to maintain higher RPMs and quicker acceleration.  When driving in ‘Sport’ mode, we definitely felt the difference and had a lot more confidence when over-taking other drivers and jumping off the line.  Obviously, we weren’t going to be sucked to the back of the seat, and we weren’t expecting to be, but we were blown away by the degree of which the orientation changes with ‘Sport’ mode engaged.

Being a hybrid, fuel-economy is essentially what matters most.  The EPA estimates 35/39 mpg and a combined 37 when mated to the CVT.  The sportier 6-speed manual equipped model brings those figures down to 31/37/34 mpg.  Our test Honda CR-Z 6-speed manual managed to average 31 mpg during a week-long test but that’s mainly because we never engaged the ‘Econ’ mode and stayed mainly in ‘Sport’. The ‘Econ’ mode will alter the car’s orientation for better efficiency, with the electric motor assist and air condition system reducing overall load on the engine. An option that is will save your wallet some grief when filling up.

Review: 2011 Honda CR-Z Hybrid

Overall:

The Honda CR-Z isn’t for everybody.  That is not to say however, that it isn’t for anybody. While many will be thrown off by the lack of performance, many still will be attracted to a vehicle that let’s them mind Mother Nature, yet still exhibit a bit of a rebellious side.

Pricing starts at $19,345 for a 6-speed manual equipped model, and $19,995 for the CVT option.  Those figures are pretty competitive for a hybrid that sports a little devilish side – emphasis on little.  If you’re a single twenty-something who is environmentally conscious and into stylish rides, than the CR-Z is for you.  If you’re married with kids and all the rest still applies, consider the Insight.

Review: 2011 Honda CR-Z:

- By: Stephen Calogera

All Photos Copyright © 2011 Omar Rana, Nikolina Kostrevski - egmCarTech.


Share |  Email  Print |

Tags: , , , , , , ,





Subscribe & Connect

Connect with us on any of our social profiles below.

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter to receive updates.

  • Pat

    I honestly love the look of this car – I just wish it came in a gasoline powered turbo

  • Jon

    It’s a great looking car…almost like an aggressive catfish…but i def agree…Honda we need to throw the Civic Si motor in here

  • Chix_boy09

    i really wanna buy this car!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Javier

    About the same MPG as a Fiesta, worse acceleration, bigger price tag

  • Daniel

    Is this car really for anybody? The exterior’s attractive, but the interior has a bad sci-fi movie style to it that’s neither attractive or comfortable. The color-changing speedo that tells you about efficiency could have changed the color of the entire IP, but it’s just one small space while the rest always glows serenely blue no matter what you do–that’s odd.

    The “back seat” area is so ridiculously inefficient I can’t find an explanation for it. Have a seat or don’t have a seat, but don’t have two Rubbermaid bucket things and a plastic wall that can either cover them or cover the back, but not both. It’s ugly, dumb, and also gets in the way of seat recline, so you can’t recline the seats much at all. Dumb.

    The gas mileage isn’t as good as non-hybrids of its size, and the performance isn’t sporty at all. In fact, I found the drivetrain absurdly rough. At stop lights, the engine would shut down with a SHUDDER (unlike the Prius, which manages this silently). Then at startup, another SHUDDER and the car would chug to life like it was a 1964 Dodge Truck. HORRIBLE.

    The “sport mode” basically just made the car LOUDER–without all that much performance.

    And in all modes, when you stopped, the AC stopped. WHAT? REALLY? So you’re in traffic on the freeway and it’s summer and hot, and the AC just stop when you do? Does that make any sense? Is anybody going to be happy with that? Once again, the Prius can run the AC or battery, or turn the engine on when necessary, but it doesn’t just leave you sitting there in the heat. This is absurd and unacceptable.

    I’ve driven nearly every make and model of car in the past five years, and I have to say the CR-Z is the very worst car I’ve driven. It surpasses the Smart car in the BAD department–even the Smart, at least, is well packaged, lots of room, great visibility, and even a sense of fun–like driving a Barcolounger with wheels. Despite it’s horrible transmission, even the Smart isn’t as bad as the CR-Z, which is more overpriced, less efficient, and just generally more useless.

    I don’t know what they’re doing at Honda, but they need to get some fresh blood in there–or bring back their California design office. Otherwise, they’re creating some of the ugliest (“Cross-Tour”? UG), pointless (CrossTour and CR-Z) cars on the road.

  • Daniel

    Is this car really for anybody? The exterior’s attractive, but the interior has a bad sci-fi movie style to it that’s neither attractive or comfortable. The color-changing speedo that tells you about efficiency could have changed the color of the entire IP, but it’s just one small space while the rest always glows serenely blue no matter what you do–that’s odd.

    The “back seat” area is so ridiculously inefficient I can’t find an explanation for it. Have a seat or don’t have a seat, but don’t have two Rubbermaid bucket things and a plastic wall that can either cover them or cover the back, but not both. It’s ugly, dumb, and also gets in the way of seat recline, so you can’t recline the seats much at all. Dumb.

    The gas mileage isn’t as good as non-hybrids of its size, and the performance isn’t sporty at all. In fact, I found the drivetrain absurdly rough. At stop lights, the engine would shut down with a SHUDDER (unlike the Prius, which manages this silently). Then at startup, another SHUDDER and the car would chug to life like it was a 1964 Dodge Truck. HORRIBLE.

    The “sport mode” basically just made the car LOUDER–without all that much performance.

    And in all modes, when you stopped, the AC stopped. WHAT? REALLY? So you’re in traffic on the freeway and it’s summer and hot, and the AC just stop when you do? Does that make any sense? Is anybody going to be happy with that? Once again, the Prius can run the AC or battery, or turn the engine on when necessary, but it doesn’t just leave you sitting there in the heat. This is absurd and unacceptable.

    I’ve driven nearly every make and model of car in the past five years, and I have to say the CR-Z is the very worst car I’ve driven. It surpasses the Smart car in the BAD department–even the Smart, at least, is well packaged, lots of room, great visibility, and even a sense of fun–like driving a Barcolounger with wheels. Despite it’s horrible transmission, even the Smart isn’t as bad as the CR-Z, which is more overpriced, less efficient, and just generally more useless.

    I don’t know what they’re doing at Honda, but they need to get some fresh blood in there–or bring back their California design office. Otherwise, they’re creating some of the ugliest (“Cross-Tour”? UG), pointless (CrossTour and CR-Z) cars on the road.

  • http://sorebuttcheeks.blogspot.com/ steroids

    really looking fwd to the mugen and cabrio versions due soon.

  • http://www.busforrental.com/index.html Party Bus DC

    When the Japanese carmaker first revealed the CR-Z Hybrid R Concept last year, we thought it was definitely a step in the right direction. The carmaker has big expectation for a turbocharged, race-bread CR-Z when it comes to racing and engineers have also created a more civilized (only a bit more civilized) version.

  • TeddyZ

    I’d like to know why a negative, yet still respectful and well-written review I saw here was removed. I remember it said something about the back seat area that wasn’t a back seat at all.

    Honestly, your comments need to be candid, and unless it said something obscene or libelous or just factually wrong, it shouldn’t have been removed.

  • http://www.egmcartech.com egmCarTech

    Nothing is ever removed from the comments section…ever

    Omar Rana
    Editor in Chief
    egmCarTech
    omar.rana@egmcartech.com
    732-690-1118
    http://www.egmcartech.com

    —– Reply message —–

  • http://www.egmcartech.com egmCarTech

    Nothing is ever removed from the comments section…ever

    Omar Rana
    Editor in Chief
    egmCarTech
    omar.rana@egmcartech.com
    732-690-1118
    http://www.egmcartech.com

    —– Reply message —–

  • http://www.egmcartech.com egmCarTech

    Nothing is ever removed from the comments section…ever

    Omar Rana
    Editor in Chief
    egmCarTech
    omar.rana@egmcartech.com
    732-690-1118
    http://www.egmcartech.com

    —– Reply message —–

  • http://www.busforrental.com/index.html Party Bus DC

    Honda has released new information about the highly-anticipated CR-Z Mugen.

    Set to be unveiled at the Goodwood Festival of Speed, the one-off prototype will feature a supercharged 1.5-liter engine and an IMA hybrid system that develops approximately 200 PS (147 kW / 197 hp) and 181 lb-ft (245 Nm) of torque.

  • http://www.hondaofnanuet.com/ mahwa nj family car

    Although I can’t say this CR-Z as a top-speed model, but this is a good family car.
    Its exterior is attractive as well as cool for driving.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XTHK6U2IMNWHSTQLXQMTBJVAAE Jessewilliam Smith

    wow incredible collection.
    Wall Street Journal Subscription Discount 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_EO7PIFHQRMV2YCS2N5FZRFCZIY hjuert hjurtyrg

    sells
    clothing,footwear,handbags,Sunglasses
    Online Store,Get Name Brand Fashion From 12USD Now!

    Handbags ( Coach Lv fendi D&G) $35

    T-shirts (polo, ed hardy, lacoste) $16

    Jean (True Religion, ed hardy, coogi)$34

    Sunglasses ( Oakey, coach, Gucci, Armaini)$15

     

    Our Website: =====  www voguecatch us  ====

    Our main
    product list is as follows:

  • Matt

    hjuert hjurtyrg 2 weeks agoWhy is this SPAM still on the site after 2 weeks? It should have been flagged and removed.

  • Matt

    Honda is trying to talk out of both side of it’s mouth with this model.
    It’s doing what a politician does when he or she is running for office :-)

  • bob

    This is the most disappointing car that Honda has ever produced– it is too underpowered and slow to be considered sporty by anyone who has driven true sport cars.  Honda foolishly saddled this car with a poor performing dated IMa system when the obviously smart move would have been to offer the hybrid as an option and offer lower cost gasoline engine as the base model with a turbo gasoline engine as an SI version.  It also has one of the poor rear visibility and is unsafe due to its poor crash test scores (3 stars overall with a two star rating in the front side impact).  Wait to the Veloster is released it will the car Honda should have released.  This underwhelming effort along with the refreshed 2012 Civic (it ain’t truly a new model as Honda’s goal seemed be directed toward cost cutting and profitability rather than spend much resouces in improving the Civic).  Honda has truly lost its way.l

  • AJK963

    I have one and LOVE THIS CAR!!! Ya if I wanted a real sports car, i’m going to be spending 50,000 plus….This car is what a $25,000 less car should be….drives great, great on gas. Only thing I did wish was that Honda made 2 seats in the back..even if very small…someone can go for a small run in the back seat.  Other than that, I think this is the best little car under $25,000. :)   People can write back with there neg on the car. Most of these people drive a shitty american car LOL