2011 Chrysler 200

Now I know I haven’t been very kind to the Chrysler products in my previous posts but it was for good reason. But as Jeremy Clarkson would’ve said, they were absolute rubbish. One of the cars to receive such feedback was the last generation Chrysler Sebring. It seemed like nothing more than a byproduct of the engineers’ coffee break discussions. It was woeful to drive, terribly built, and hopelessly unattractive and under those pretenses, was immediately destined for fleet use. If you’ve ever rented a car before, chances were you had time behind the wheel of one and I’m awfully sorry if you ever have. Honestly, I would rather have traveled by shopping cart.

And because the Sebring was one of the definitions of Chrysler’s problems, they dropped the Sebring name for 2011. It is now called the 200 and according to Chrysler, the 200 has undergone some significant changes. But as far as I’m concerned, it really doesn’t seem like it.

Click here for more news on the Chrysler 200.

I’ll start off with the looks. Sure it has a new face and a new rear, but the Sebring’s basic proportions and shoulder line still remain the same. And really how desperate is Chrysler, if they decided to brag about a new “LED center stoplight,” which I’m guessing, is referring to a third brake light. Even despite the new face and visual upgrades, it looks like the old Sebring was rebadged and given a facelift. The point where the steep shoulder line and the C-pillar meet… looked terrible on the Sebring, and it looks terrible on the 200.

Read more after the jump.

2011 Chrysler 200:

Engine wise, the 2.4L four-banger also has been tweaked according to Chrysler and can you guess how much more power it received? Well, it hasn’t changed at all. The new Pentastar V6 however will find its way into the Sebring, delivering 283-hp and 260 lb-ft of torque, which is quite a bit of power to be sending to a front-wheel drive car. Both engines are mated to six-speed autos, and Chrysler says they will still offer the four-speed automatic for the price conscious buyers, but why?

Suspension wise, Chrysler claims that the new 200 had its suspension completely redesigned. The track has been widened, and ride has been lowered for a lower center of gravity and more aggressive stance. Additionally, both the chassis and suspension tuning have been worked to reduce road and wind noise, less body roll, better steering precision and less vehicle vibrations.

So, just like the rest of Chrysler’s new lineup, everything seems pretty promising on paper. But I still think the 200 is still aesthetically challenged, no matter how much they improve the Sebri…I mean 200. Of course, this is by no means a full review and will reserve my complete judgment when I get behind the wheel and see it in person. Check back with egmCarTech for a full review when we get into one.

2011 Chrysler 200 Sedan Prices (including a $750 destination charge):

  • 2011 Chrysler 200 LX: $19,995
  • 2011 Chrysler 200 Touring: $21,995
  • 2011 Chrysler 200 Limited: $24,495

2011 Chrysler 200:

- By: Chris Chin


Share |  Email  Print |

Tags: , , ,






Subscribe & Connect

Connect with us on any of our social profiles below.

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter to receive updates.

  • TomG

    So… you are reviewing a car you haven’t driven, and haven’t seen in person. Good job there, I’m sure people will be coming back here for biased opinions based on pictures instead of legwork…

  • Guest

    This is by no means a car review. Ever hear of “first impressions?”

  • http://www.havalimanirentacar.com/ rent a car

    Thanks.

  • Try Again, Chris

    You’re an idiot.
    Quite possibly the worst written article I have ever read in my lifetime.

    An educated person wouldn’t try to write about something they have
    no knowledge on. Try rewriting it after you finish middle school.

  • Guest

    And you are equally just as hypocritical. An educated person would not assume one’s background based off of one article written. It is not even considered a full review. How do you know he has never driven a Chrysler Sebring? How do you expect anyone in the car industry to to make prediction on an outcome of a vehicle if, by your logic, is to wait until it is finally out and complete ignore past efforts? He clearly wrote in the closing paragraph, this is by no means a full review and he reserves final judgment until he sees it in person.

    Try commenting after you pass puberty.

  • Mlosuno

    Does anyone else think it looks the new Taurus? Cover up the front end of the front profile pic and see if you see it. I’d rather just buy the Taurus.

  • Hankhill

    This writer is 100% true, look at concept pictures for 2011 200C it looks nothing like this.
    I was about to buy that concept look but now it looks 1000% like an old Chrysler.
    It sucks and I will not even bother to go to check it out at the showroom. It will be Buick Regal or Hyundai Sonata or Kia Optima. Chrysler needs to smell the coffee or it will shut down production and even FIAT will not help, since they suck too.
    You must work for Chrysler or something but that guy is correct, true article!

  • Hankhill

    This writer is 100% true, look at concept pictures for 2011 200C it looks nothing like this.
    I was about to buy that concept look but now it looks 1000% like an old Chrysler.
    It sucks and I will not even bother to go to check it out at the showroom. It will be Buick Regal or Hyundai Sonata or Kia Optima. Chrysler needs to smell the coffee or it will shut down production and even FIAT will not help, since they suck too.
    You must work for Chrysler or something but that guy is correct, true article!

  • Steelerstumpf

    whoever wrote this article is a true nutsack

  • Steelerstumpf

     you clearly do not know what goes into making a production car.your a fucking idiot