<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Question of the Day: 2010 Buick LaCrosse or 2009 Lexus ES?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2010/03/04/question-of-the-day-2010-buick-lacrosse-or-2009-lexus-es/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2010/03/04/question-of-the-day-2010-buick-lacrosse-or-2009-lexus-es/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=question-of-the-day-2010-buick-lacrosse-or-2009-lexus-es</link>
	<description>Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: meraboy</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2010/03/04/question-of-the-day-2010-buick-lacrosse-or-2009-lexus-es/comment-page-1/#comment-624733</link>
		<dc:creator>meraboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=52386#comment-624733</guid>
		<description>LaCrosse for sure, simply i do not want to drive a &quot;Moving Forward w/o stopping&quot; Lexus ES, plus it&#039;s more expensive than LaCrosse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LaCrosse for sure, simply i do not want to drive a &#8220;Moving Forward w/o stopping&#8221; Lexus ES, plus it&#39;s more expensive than LaCrosse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2010/03/04/question-of-the-day-2010-buick-lacrosse-or-2009-lexus-es/comment-page-1/#comment-624719</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 21:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=52386#comment-624719</guid>
		<description>Definitely the Lacrosse it&#039;s much better looking (in my opinion) on the exterior.  Having sat in both, it also has a much more comfortable, luxurious interior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely the Lacrosse it&#39;s much better looking (in my opinion) on the exterior.  Having sat in both, it also has a much more comfortable, luxurious interior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pradeep</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2010/03/04/question-of-the-day-2010-buick-lacrosse-or-2009-lexus-es/comment-page-1/#comment-624713</link>
		<dc:creator>Pradeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=52386#comment-624713</guid>
		<description>Going by your logic, every car is a death mobile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Going by your logic, every car is a death mobile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2010/03/04/question-of-the-day-2010-buick-lacrosse-or-2009-lexus-es/comment-page-1/#comment-624711</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 04:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=52386#comment-624711</guid>
		<description>Lacrosse makes more sense. Conspicuous consumption is reduced plus its a better value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lacrosse makes more sense. Conspicuous consumption is reduced plus its a better value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dd</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2010/03/04/question-of-the-day-2010-buick-lacrosse-or-2009-lexus-es/comment-page-1/#comment-624710</link>
		<dc:creator>dd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 04:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=52386#comment-624710</guid>
		<description>Lexus = Toyota = Death Mobile!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lexus = Toyota = Death Mobile!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: auszac</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2010/03/04/question-of-the-day-2010-buick-lacrosse-or-2009-lexus-es/comment-page-1/#comment-624708</link>
		<dc:creator>auszac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=52386#comment-624708</guid>
		<description>Of the 2, I&#039;d have to say Buick. At least it shouldn&#039;t unintentionally accelerate. I think a Ford Taurus SHO is a better proposition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of the 2, I&#39;d have to say Buick. At least it shouldn&#39;t unintentionally accelerate. I think a Ford Taurus SHO is a better proposition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWUCNKRAN4AIAXCYIPC8RAJLLCIM</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2010/03/04/question-of-the-day-2010-buick-lacrosse-or-2009-lexus-es/comment-page-1/#comment-624705</link>
		<dc:creator>AWUCNKRAN4AIAXCYIPC8RAJLLCIM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=52386#comment-624705</guid>
		<description>I think both are nice. The LaCrosse is a bit more distinctive and I like it more.&lt;br&gt;But to full disclosure I have driven neither.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think both are nice. The LaCrosse is a bit more distinctive and I like it more.<br />But to full disclosure I have driven neither.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMfan87</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2010/03/04/question-of-the-day-2010-buick-lacrosse-or-2009-lexus-es/comment-page-1/#comment-624704</link>
		<dc:creator>GMfan87</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=52386#comment-624704</guid>
		<description>lacrosse is a way better package.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lacrosse is a way better package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Bungle</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2010/03/04/question-of-the-day-2010-buick-lacrosse-or-2009-lexus-es/comment-page-1/#comment-624701</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Bungle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=52386#comment-624701</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll never support Toyota corp. again!  &lt;br&gt;Of the two, I&#039;d pick Lacrosse, but I&#039;d prefer Audi to Buick (or any GM...except for that CTS-V....wonderful car there!) anyday!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ll never support Toyota corp. again!  <br />Of the two, I&#39;d pick Lacrosse, but I&#39;d prefer Audi to Buick (or any GM&#8230;except for that CTS-V&#8230;.wonderful car there!) anyday!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kona</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2010/03/04/question-of-the-day-2010-buick-lacrosse-or-2009-lexus-es/comment-page-1/#comment-624699</link>
		<dc:creator>Kona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=52386#comment-624699</guid>
		<description>Without a doubt LACROSSE!!! Why would you even consider a Lexus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without a doubt LACROSSE!!! Why would you even consider a Lexus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hakeam</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2010/03/04/question-of-the-day-2010-buick-lacrosse-or-2009-lexus-es/comment-page-1/#comment-624700</link>
		<dc:creator>hakeam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=52386#comment-624700</guid>
		<description>Certainly Lexus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly Lexus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathieu Campanozzi</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2010/03/04/question-of-the-day-2010-buick-lacrosse-or-2009-lexus-es/comment-page-1/#comment-624698</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathieu Campanozzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=52386#comment-624698</guid>
		<description>Lexus for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lexus for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Titanosaurus</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2010/03/04/question-of-the-day-2010-buick-lacrosse-or-2009-lexus-es/comment-page-1/#comment-624697</link>
		<dc:creator>Titanosaurus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=52386#comment-624697</guid>
		<description>If I HAD to pick .... LeCrosse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I HAD to pick &#8230;. LeCrosse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2010/03/04/question-of-the-day-2010-buick-lacrosse-or-2009-lexus-es/comment-page-1/#comment-624696</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=52386#comment-624696</guid>
		<description>Im going with the LaCrosse... not because the ES has a recall....just because it seems like a better buy. most mid-size sedan shoppers aren&#039;t looking to go extra fast...they are looking for a comfortable, some what powerful luxury vehicle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im going with the LaCrosse&#8230; not because the ES has a recall&#8230;.just because it seems like a better buy. most mid-size sedan shoppers aren&#39;t looking to go extra fast&#8230;they are looking for a comfortable, some what powerful luxury vehicle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 407/408 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.egmcartech.com @ 2012-02-13 11:50:29 -->
