http://www.egmcartech.com/2010/02/18/review-2010-cadillac-srx-take-2-2-8l-v6-turbo/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=review-2010-cadillac-srx-take-2-2-8l-v6-turbo Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:40:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.egmcartech.com/2010/02/18/review-2010-cadillac-srx-take-2-2-8l-v6-turbo/comment-page-1/#comment-626066 tbird635 Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:47:33 +0000 http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=51229#comment-626066 I guess the Lincoln MKT is not considered competition due to it's larger size and weight (400 lbs heavier). <br>But, the Lincoln does have a serious hp advantage in turbo form (355hp on regular fuel, vs 300 on premium for the Caddy), plus it gets better mileage. (Caddy 16 mpg in eco-mode, Lincoln 17.3 ), and is faster (6.3 to 60 in the Lincoln). Pricing is almost identical. <br> I think I'd look seriously at the MKT if I were considering a luxo-barge SUV. I guess the Lincoln MKT is not considered competition due to it's larger size and weight (400 lbs heavier).
But, the Lincoln does have a serious hp advantage in turbo form (355hp on regular fuel, vs 300 on premium for the Caddy), plus it gets better mileage. (Caddy 16 mpg in eco-mode, Lincoln 17.3 ), and is faster (6.3 to 60 in the Lincoln). Pricing is almost identical.
I think I'd look seriously at the MKT if I were considering a luxo-barge SUV.

]]> http://www.egmcartech.com/2010/02/18/review-2010-cadillac-srx-take-2-2-8l-v6-turbo/comment-page-1/#comment-624432 Pat Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:50:08 +0000 http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=51229#comment-624432 At that price-tag I'd rather go for the 3.0L V6 model - i don't know why GM doesn't offer this engine on the base SRX models At that price-tag I'd rather go for the 3.0L V6 model – i don't know why GM doesn't offer this engine on the base SRX models

]]>