Judging by the comments you made on our 2011 Honda CR-Z Detroit Auto Show debut post, you guys don’t seem too impressed by Honda’s new hybrid hatchback. We haven’t driven the CR-Z (and probably won’t for a while), but we’re praying that its better than the Insight we drove last month.

Nonetheless, Honda seems pretty keen on letting people know that the CR-Z will be fun to drive hybrid. In a new video released today, Honda engineers let us know what their inspirations were when producing the CR-Z hybrid.

Some quotes in the video that may surprise you:

  • “We therefore wanted to realize the agile handling of the Mini…”
  • During the development of the CR-Z we have driven many cars and have also bought several cars for comparison and benchmarking – the Mini, the Scirocco, but also a Lotus Elise.”
  • …”and set the body stiffness at a similar level to that of a Civic Type R.”

Check out the video for more.

Refresher: The 2011 Honda CR-Z is powered by a 1.5L i-VTEC mated to Honda’s Integrated Motor Assist hybrid system. It produces a total of 122-hp and a maximum torque of 128 lb-ft when mated to manual transmission (123 lb-ft for CVT models). Fuel-economy is estimated at 31/37 mpg (city/highway) for the manual model and 36/38 mpg for the CVT model. Sales begin in the second half of 2010.

2010 Detroit: 2011 Honda CR-Z:

2010 Detroit: 2011 Honda CR-Z 2010 Detroit: 2011 Honda CR-Z 2010 Detroit: 2011 Honda CR-Z 2010 Detroit: 2011 Honda CR-Z

2010 Detroit: 2011 Honda CR-Z:

All Photos Copyright © 2009 Stephen Calogera – egmCarTech.

- By: Kap Shah

Share |  Email  Print |



  • rodan

    It is all relative. I do not doubt that this thing will be sportier than a Prius but nowhere near as fun as an S2000.

  • GMfan87

    lotus elise….? wtf

  • RotaryLover

    The Elise was inspiring? If it was then that CR Z would never had been an hybrid in the first place. Hybrids systems adds weight for nothing and adding weight is not Lotus's motto. Am pretty sure that if they removed the hybrid system and worked more on the engine and shaving more weight, they would had end up with the same MPG they are getting now.

blog comments powered by Disqus