Comments on: Review: 2010 Cadillac SRX redefines itself, does a great job

By: livjon

livjon — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:20:20 +0000

Nice aggressive styling, looks good in the urban jungle. Power panarama roof and power liftgate are nice touches. The LCD in the center of the speedo is a neat trick, but a little distracting. Keyless go works well. Decently quiet ride and controlled suspension. Good 2-level cargo cover.
social bookmarking services

By: Cheap used cars

Cheap used cars — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:55:23 +0000

I love the overall body design. Unlike RX, which has been getting uglier with each iteration, SRX is going in the right direction.

By: Voltron

Voltron — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:13:08 +0000

Globalisation has begun and a lot of y'all are still holding on to the past… you have to live only in North America to say something as subliminal as “overweight underpowered under-engineered” ; “engine is too small to handle the mass that this vehicle has” , “someone needs to make a more luxury oriented CUV to compete w/ the dominant RX350″ ever hear of the Mercedes GLK, Audi Q5, BMW X3? Lexus is a stronghold in America not globally…. the Audi Q5 has a 2.0 T that is more than capable… it's so funny! americans have a totally distorted perception of what Premium is…(Luxury is Aston Martin, S Class, Maserati, etc and not you Acura, Cadillac, Lexus, Lincoln), why do you think your Cadillac, Lexus, Acura, Lincoln don't cut it globally? …GM has realised this and they are changing…wake up now!!! The CTS is GM's very very first genuine and true effort to compete with other Global brands and it's reaping the benefits!

By: Mogar

Mogar — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:27:58 +0000

What is this cars target audience? Despite this being an overweight underpowered under-engineered disappointment I have seen a fair amount of them on the road already. The Taillights do look pretty good lit up I'll admit

By: tall1

tall1 — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:18:03 +0000

I prefer the older model to this gussied up Equinox. From what most reviews (except this one) have said is that the engine is too small to handle the mass that this vehicle has. in addition the second row seating space is quite small compared to the competition and it's platform mate the Equinox (not to mention the previous version). I think they missed the boat by not offering the third-row option even if it was only for kiddies. Just think how many familes bought the last version but can't buy this version due to the lack of the third-row. This is a quick fix that just does not compete with the competitors.

By: Pat

Pat — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:07:58 +0000

great crossover for a great price tag. Def a better pick over the rest

By: gojira

gojira — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:38:59 +0000

Eh, someone needs to make a more luxury oriented CUV to compete w/ the dominant RX350. The only thing that comes close is the Enclave. The Mclass, x5 & MDX all are on the sporty side & none come close to swaying the soccer moms from the RX350 …