<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 LA: 2011 Ford Mustang V6 one-ups Camaro in power and fuel-economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/12/02/2009-la-2011-ford-mustang-v6-one-ups-camaro-in-power-and-fuel-economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/12/02/2009-la-2011-ford-mustang-v6-one-ups-camaro-in-power-and-fuel-economy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=2009-la-2011-ford-mustang-v6-one-ups-camaro-in-power-and-fuel-economy</link>
	<description>Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/12/02/2009-la-2011-ford-mustang-v6-one-ups-camaro-in-power-and-fuel-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-619692</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=45717#comment-619692</guid>
		<description>The new V6 Mustang shpuld be almost 500 lbs lighter ( the new mustang engine is about 50 pounds lighter then the current V6 is as well)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new V6 Mustang shpuld be almost 500 lbs lighter ( the new mustang engine is about 50 pounds lighter then the current V6 is as well)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/12/02/2009-la-2011-ford-mustang-v6-one-ups-camaro-in-power-and-fuel-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-619693</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=45717#comment-619693</guid>
		<description>Even though HP is close to the Camaro V6 it will easily dispose of it since the Mustang is almost 600lbs lighter ( the new mustang engine is about 50 pounds lighter then the current V6 is)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though HP is close to the Camaro V6 it will easily dispose of it since the Mustang is almost 600lbs lighter ( the new mustang engine is about 50 pounds lighter then the current V6 is)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/12/02/2009-la-2011-ford-mustang-v6-one-ups-camaro-in-power-and-fuel-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-616929</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=45717#comment-616929</guid>
		<description>The new V6 Mustang shpuld be almost 500 lbs lighter ( the new mustang engine is about 50 pounds lighter then the current V6 is as well)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new V6 Mustang shpuld be almost 500 lbs lighter ( the new mustang engine is about 50 pounds lighter then the current V6 is as well)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/12/02/2009-la-2011-ford-mustang-v6-one-ups-camaro-in-power-and-fuel-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-616930</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=45717#comment-616930</guid>
		<description>Even though HP is close to the Camaro V6 it will easily dispose of it since the Mustang is almost 600lbs lighter ( the new mustang engine is about 50 pounds lighter then the current V6 is)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though HP is close to the Camaro V6 it will easily dispose of it since the Mustang is almost 600lbs lighter ( the new mustang engine is about 50 pounds lighter then the current V6 is)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mogar</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/12/02/2009-la-2011-ford-mustang-v6-one-ups-camaro-in-power-and-fuel-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-616807</link>
		<dc:creator>Mogar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 02:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=45717#comment-616807</guid>
		<description>With 300 lbs. less weight, a far nicer interior, and overall more livable car, this engine is all the Mustang will need to thoroughly mop the floor with the Camaro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With 300 lbs. less weight, a far nicer interior, and overall more livable car, this engine is all the Mustang will need to thoroughly mop the floor with the Camaro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 271/272 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.egmcartech.com @ 2012-02-13 14:25:52 -->
