Weekly Test-Drive: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2LT with 6-speed manual

Posted: Nov 04, 2009

Filed under: 2010 Releases, Chevrolet, GM, Reviews

2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2LT (Weekly Test-Drive)

The 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is back in the egmCarTech garage – however, unlike the V8 Camaro SS we previously tested, this Camaro carries a 304-hp 3.6L V6 mated to the Aisin Warner AY6 6-speed manual transmission.

First Impressions: It’s yellow like Bumblebee but it doesn’t have the black stripes nor does it have the Transformers package. While we would have loved to test the V6 Camaro mated to a Hydra-Matic 6L50 and see how it manages to hold up to its EPA rated fuel-economy of 18/29 mpg (city/highway) – as enthusiasts, we never give up a chance to get behind a manual transmission and test the car’s performance to its limits. When compared to its rival the base V6 2010 Ford Mustang, the V6 2010 Chevrolet Camaro really sticks out. While the V6 2010 Mustang only makes 210-hp, the V6 Camaro makes a respectable 304-hp with a maximum torque of 273 lb-ft. Opt for the manual transmission and the performance of the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro LS and LT model is sure to put a smile on your face.

Our test 2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2LT carries a total vehicle price of $29,270. Base pricing starts at $26,875 and the RS Package (20-inch wheels, HID headlamps with a halo ring, RS tail lamps and a rear-spoiler) adds $1,450 to the final price.

Ask us all the questions you want about the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2LT while we’re test-driving it this week and we’ll be sure to answer as many as we can.

2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2LT (Weekly Test-Drive):

- By: Stephen Calogera

Bobmarley

How is the visibility from the drivers seat? the drivers seat looks low and the hood looks huge...and blind spots?

egmCarTech

Visibility is one section where the Camaro falls apart. Especially with the bulge in the hood. Even visibility on the side windows and rear window is a bit poor.

Stephen Calogera
Senior Editor

glivingston

I was wondering how well this vehicle would do with a turbocharger, it seems that more auto makers are going with 4 & 6 cylinders with other performance upgrades to improve not only performance, mileage, and handling. I love V-8's, but it seems they are more than likely going to be short lived, just like in the mid to late 70's. Do you think this option would be a quality addition ????/

egmCarTech

For muscle cars I feel naturally aspirated engines is where it's at. However, with the market changing the way it is... we may see turbocharging and direct-injection play a larger roll in every segment.

Stephen Calogera
Senior Editor

GMfan87

do you still get as many looks from people now that the camaro has been out for a little while?

egmCarTech

Yes, people still tailgate, pull up next to us and everything. It's a bit crazy how much attention the Camaro attracts.

Stephen Calogera
Senior Editor

jimbyjim

How does the car handle? For some reason, the car looks like it would have a lot of body roll...maybe that would be minimized with the big V8, but with the less powered V6, do you guys feel it more?

Also, how does the car compare to the SS? Does it feel slow or does it have a lot of "pep" to it?

egmCarTech

Well the Camaro SS we had did 0-60 mph in 4.6 seconds. The Camaro V6 does it in 6.1. Nonetheless, the V6 with a manual does have a LOT of pep to it. It has really nice pick up and for some reason (personally) I feel the V6 has a tighter steering feel than the V8 model, which I love. It handles very well, but again - it's not BMW.

Stephen Calogera
Editor in Chief

egmCarTech

Weekly Test-Drive: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2LT with 6-speed manual

Recent Comments

Photos on flickr

Recent Posts