<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Suzuki&#8217;s future U.S. product plans depend on Kizashi&#8217;s performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/10/20/suzukis-future-u-s-product-plans-depend-on-kizashis-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/10/20/suzukis-future-u-s-product-plans-depend-on-kizashis-performance/</link>
	<description>Breaking Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:47:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gekke Henkie</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/10/20/suzukis-future-u-s-product-plans-depend-on-kizashis-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-620105</link>
		<dc:creator>Gekke Henkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 05:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=42966#comment-620105</guid>
		<description>260hp and AWD? That&#039;s more than the 237hp Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart with AWD. If they can keep the weight down, it would possibly need to be limited at 250 km/h :).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not bad-looking either IMHO; let&#039;s hope it sells, so city-drivers can have the new Swift as well. The Swift is going to be the smallest AWD-car on the continent (and less than 380cm, so with tax-credits in some cities).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>260hp and AWD? That&#39;s more than the 237hp Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart with AWD. If they can keep the weight down, it would possibly need to be limited at 250 km/h <img src='http://www.egmcartech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>Not bad-looking either IMHO; let&#39;s hope it sells, so city-drivers can have the new Swift as well. The Swift is going to be the smallest AWD-car on the continent (and less than 380cm, so with tax-credits in some cities).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gekke Henkie</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/10/20/suzukis-future-u-s-product-plans-depend-on-kizashis-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-615758</link>
		<dc:creator>Gekke Henkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=42966#comment-615758</guid>
		<description>260hp and AWD? That&#039;s more than the 237hp Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart with AWD. If they can keep the weight down, it would possibly need to be limited at 250 km/h :).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not bad-looking either IMHO; let&#039;s hope it sells, so city-drivers can have the new Swift as well. The Swift is going to be the smallest AWD-car on the continent (and less than 380cm, so with tax-credits in some cities).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>260hp and AWD? That&#39;s more than the 237hp Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart with AWD. If they can keep the weight down, it would possibly need to be limited at 250 km/h <img src='http://www.egmcartech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>Not bad-looking either IMHO; let&#39;s hope it sells, so city-drivers can have the new Swift as well. The Swift is going to be the smallest AWD-car on the continent (and less than 380cm, so with tax-credits in some cities).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
