<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: 2010 Mazda3, it&#8217;s smiling at you&#8230; and you should smile back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/09/29/review-2010-mazda3-its-smiling-at-you-and-you-should-smile-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/09/29/review-2010-mazda3-its-smiling-at-you-and-you-should-smile-back/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=review-2010-mazda3-its-smiling-at-you-and-you-should-smile-back</link>
	<description>Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotaryLover</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/09/29/review-2010-mazda3-its-smiling-at-you-and-you-should-smile-back/comment-page-1/#comment-629469</link>
		<dc:creator>RotaryLover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=41360#comment-629469</guid>
		<description>I bought the 2.0L sedan model...I love it and it&#039;s too fun to drive but, man that engine is thirsty. I do have a heavy foot sometimes but getting 12L/100 km out of it constantly...that wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought the 2.0L sedan model&#8230;I love it and it&#39;s too fun to drive but, man that engine is thirsty. I do have a heavy foot sometimes but getting 12L/100 km out of it constantly&#8230;that wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/09/29/review-2010-mazda3-its-smiling-at-you-and-you-should-smile-back/comment-page-1/#comment-624227</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=41360#comment-624227</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t know what the folks at Mazda were thinking when they designed this car. It looks... well, horrible. Regardless, I purchased this car because it did &quot;feel&quot; good and felt solid. Got into a fender bender not too long ago (more of a bender really) and as a result it turns out the frame is bent! Did Mazda ever skimp on materials with this car! Sure there are more gizmos in it than in previous models, but it&#039;s not as solid as it may look. Total damage estimate is 1/3 the purchase price of the vehicle and it wasn&#039;t a significant crash either. Awful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#39;t know what the folks at Mazda were thinking when they designed this car. It looks&#8230; well, horrible. Regardless, I purchased this car because it did &#8220;feel&#8221; good and felt solid. Got into a fender bender not too long ago (more of a bender really) and as a result it turns out the frame is bent! Did Mazda ever skimp on materials with this car! Sure there are more gizmos in it than in previous models, but it&#39;s not as solid as it may look. Total damage estimate is 1/3 the purchase price of the vehicle and it wasn&#39;t a significant crash either. Awful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rowrbazzle</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/09/29/review-2010-mazda3-its-smiling-at-you-and-you-should-smile-back/comment-page-1/#comment-618206</link>
		<dc:creator>rowrbazzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=41360#comment-618206</guid>
		<description>The original 3 had an ultra-bland design? Really? I don&#039;t think that description could be more off base. The 2010 exterior is a clear step backward from the previous model. But compared to the competition, the 3 is still a clear winner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original 3 had an ultra-bland design? Really? I don&#39;t think that description could be more off base. The 2010 exterior is a clear step backward from the previous model. But compared to the competition, the 3 is still a clear winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zermatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/09/29/review-2010-mazda3-its-smiling-at-you-and-you-should-smile-back/comment-page-1/#comment-618207</link>
		<dc:creator>zermatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=41360#comment-618207</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get teh styling for this car. To me, the front of the car looks odd. The &quot;smile&quot; is a styling feature that I can&#039;t get past. Is it supposed to appeal to women?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t get teh styling for this car. To me, the front of the car looks odd. The &#8220;smile&#8221; is a styling feature that I can&#39;t get past. Is it supposed to appeal to women?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egmCarTech</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/09/29/review-2010-mazda3-its-smiling-at-you-and-you-should-smile-back/comment-page-1/#comment-618209</link>
		<dc:creator>egmCarTech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=41360#comment-618209</guid>
		<description>Good catch ADay. We wish it was 39 mpg too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good catch ADay. We wish it was 39 mpg too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADay</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/09/29/review-2010-mazda3-its-smiling-at-you-and-you-should-smile-back/comment-page-1/#comment-618208</link>
		<dc:creator>ADay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=41360#comment-618208</guid>
		<description>Better recheck the MPG.  I think it&#039;s 29 HWY.  I wish it was 39!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better recheck the MPG.  I think it&#39;s 29 HWY.  I wish it was 39!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/09/29/review-2010-mazda3-its-smiling-at-you-and-you-should-smile-back/comment-page-1/#comment-618210</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=41360#comment-618210</guid>
		<description>I would definitely pick this over the corolla and the civic. I drove one of these and it&#039;s surprising how nice and tight the steering is</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would definitely pick this over the corolla and the civic. I drove one of these and it&#39;s surprising how nice and tight the steering is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rowrbazzle</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/09/29/review-2010-mazda3-its-smiling-at-you-and-you-should-smile-back/comment-page-1/#comment-615293</link>
		<dc:creator>rowrbazzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=41360#comment-615293</guid>
		<description>The original 3 had an ultra-bland design? Really? I don&#039;t think that description could be more off base. The 2010 exterior is a clear step backward from the previous model. But compared to the competition, the 3 is still a clear winner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original 3 had an ultra-bland design? Really? I don&#39;t think that description could be more off base. The 2010 exterior is a clear step backward from the previous model. But compared to the competition, the 3 is still a clear winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zermatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/09/29/review-2010-mazda3-its-smiling-at-you-and-you-should-smile-back/comment-page-1/#comment-615283</link>
		<dc:creator>zermatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=41360#comment-615283</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get teh styling for this car. To me, the front of the car looks odd. The &quot;smile&quot; is a styling feature that I can&#039;t get past. Is it supposed to appeal to women?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t get teh styling for this car. To me, the front of the car looks odd. The &#8220;smile&#8221; is a styling feature that I can&#39;t get past. Is it supposed to appeal to women?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egmCarTech</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/09/29/review-2010-mazda3-its-smiling-at-you-and-you-should-smile-back/comment-page-1/#comment-615282</link>
		<dc:creator>egmCarTech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=41360#comment-615282</guid>
		<description>Good catch ADay. We wish it was 39 mpg too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good catch ADay. We wish it was 39 mpg too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADay</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/09/29/review-2010-mazda3-its-smiling-at-you-and-you-should-smile-back/comment-page-1/#comment-615281</link>
		<dc:creator>ADay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=41360#comment-615281</guid>
		<description>Better recheck the MPG.  I think it&#039;s 29 HWY.  I wish it was 39!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better recheck the MPG.  I think it&#39;s 29 HWY.  I wish it was 39!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/09/29/review-2010-mazda3-its-smiling-at-you-and-you-should-smile-back/comment-page-1/#comment-615280</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=41360#comment-615280</guid>
		<description>I would definitely pick this over the corolla and the civic. I drove one of these and it&#039;s surprising how nice and tight the steering is</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would definitely pick this over the corolla and the civic. I drove one of these and it&#39;s surprising how nice and tight the steering is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 377/378 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.egmcartech.com @ 2012-02-13 13:43:57 -->
