<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brand Spankin&#8217; New Images: Tesla Roadster Sport&#8230; why pay the extra $19,500?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/08/21/brand-spankin-new-images-tesla-roadster-sport-why-pay-the-extra-19500/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/08/21/brand-spankin-new-images-tesla-roadster-sport-why-pay-the-extra-19500/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=brand-spankin-new-images-tesla-roadster-sport-why-pay-the-extra-19500</link>
	<description>Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMfan87</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/08/21/brand-spankin-new-images-tesla-roadster-sport-why-pay-the-extra-19500/comment-page-1/#comment-622245</link>
		<dc:creator>GMfan87</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=38878#comment-622245</guid>
		<description>if you can afford a $100,000 electric car your not buying it for the performance...i dont think they&#039;ll have a problem selling a &quot;top of the line&quot; version of the tesla</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you can afford a $100,000 electric car your not buying it for the performance&#8230;i dont think they&#39;ll have a problem selling a &#8220;top of the line&#8221; version of the tesla</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/08/21/brand-spankin-new-images-tesla-roadster-sport-why-pay-the-extra-19500/comment-page-1/#comment-622246</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 03:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=38878#comment-622246</guid>
		<description>same here....$20,000 extra is way too much... i would just go for the Tesla Roadster at $106k if i cared for the environment that much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>same here&#8230;.$20,000 extra is way too much&#8230; i would just go for the Tesla Roadster at $106k if i cared for the environment that much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMfan87</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/08/21/brand-spankin-new-images-tesla-roadster-sport-why-pay-the-extra-19500/comment-page-1/#comment-610128</link>
		<dc:creator>GMfan87</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=38878#comment-610128</guid>
		<description>if you can afford a $100,000 electric car your not buying it for the performance...i dont think they&#039;ll have a problem selling a &quot;top of the line&quot; version of the tesla</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you can afford a $100,000 electric car your not buying it for the performance&#8230;i dont think they&#39;ll have a problem selling a &#8220;top of the line&#8221; version of the tesla</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/08/21/brand-spankin-new-images-tesla-roadster-sport-why-pay-the-extra-19500/comment-page-1/#comment-610129</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=38878#comment-610129</guid>
		<description>same here....$20,000 extra is way too much... i would just go for the Tesla Roadster at $106k if i cared for the environment that much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>same here&#8230;.$20,000 extra is way too much&#8230; i would just go for the Tesla Roadster at $106k if i cared for the environment that much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: facebook-703115170</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/08/21/brand-spankin-new-images-tesla-roadster-sport-why-pay-the-extra-19500/comment-page-1/#comment-610130</link>
		<dc:creator>facebook-703115170</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=38878#comment-610130</guid>
		<description>even if I did have an extra $20k lying around (or the $100k to buy a base model) I can&#039;t see how a suspension, engine, and gearing upgrade that results in a 0.2 second 0-60 improvement is worth it. I wonder how much for the suspension alone.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Really can&#039;t wait for the 4-door to become available, it&#039;d be nice if they could drop the price of that another $10k though so it could compete with accords and camrys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even if I did have an extra $20k lying around (or the $100k to buy a base model) I can&#39;t see how a suspension, engine, and gearing upgrade that results in a 0.2 second 0-60 improvement is worth it. I wonder how much for the suspension alone.</p>
<p>Really can&#39;t wait for the 4-door to become available, it&#39;d be nice if they could drop the price of that another $10k though so it could compete with accords and camrys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 272/273 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.egmcartech.com @ 2012-02-13 14:28:50 -->
