<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM considering Tata Nano competitor for emerging markets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/08/18/gm-considering-tata-nano-competitor-for-emerging-markets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/08/18/gm-considering-tata-nano-competitor-for-emerging-markets/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=gm-considering-tata-nano-competitor-for-emerging-markets</link>
	<description>Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zermatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/08/18/gm-considering-tata-nano-competitor-for-emerging-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-622720</link>
		<dc:creator>zermatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=38627#comment-622720</guid>
		<description>Great cars for the US remains to be proven. GM doesn&#039;t have the reputation provided by a track record to support a belief in future success.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At this point, they are working with money from governments that are expecting that the taxpayer money spent will go to boosting operations in those countries. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A Nano competitor cannot be made in the US or Canada, but possibly in Brazil or Korea. If GM is going to make the car is Brazil or Korea, then they should do the development and production with private investments or money from the Brazilian or Korean governments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Production in a country that GM isn&#039;t in now is even more of an argument for private funding or funding from the host country.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wonder if the Nana competitor was part of the plan proposed by GM to the government? Doesn&#039;t seem likely since cars like this have very thin margins and it would be inconsistent with the plan to return to profitability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great cars for the US remains to be proven. GM doesn&#39;t have the reputation provided by a track record to support a belief in future success.</p>
<p>At this point, they are working with money from governments that are expecting that the taxpayer money spent will go to boosting operations in those countries. </p>
<p>A Nano competitor cannot be made in the US or Canada, but possibly in Brazil or Korea. If GM is going to make the car is Brazil or Korea, then they should do the development and production with private investments or money from the Brazilian or Korean governments.</p>
<p>Production in a country that GM isn&#39;t in now is even more of an argument for private funding or funding from the host country.</p>
<p>I wonder if the Nana competitor was part of the plan proposed by GM to the government? Doesn&#39;t seem likely since cars like this have very thin margins and it would be inconsistent with the plan to return to profitability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMfan87</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/08/18/gm-considering-tata-nano-competitor-for-emerging-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-622719</link>
		<dc:creator>GMfan87</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=38627#comment-622719</guid>
		<description>....global economy....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;GM has a great line-up planned for the US already, y not try to make some money where there isn&#039;t a stigma that goes along with the GM brands and people actually give their cars a chance....and (get this) like them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.global economy&#8230;.</p>
<p>GM has a great line-up planned for the US already, y not try to make some money where there isn&#39;t a stigma that goes along with the GM brands and people actually give their cars a chance&#8230;.and (get this) like them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zermatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/08/18/gm-considering-tata-nano-competitor-for-emerging-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-611019</link>
		<dc:creator>zermatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=38627#comment-611019</guid>
		<description>Great cars for the US remains to be proven. GM doesn&#039;t have the reputation provided by a track record to support a belief in future success.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At this point, they are working with money from governments that are expecting that the taxpayer money spent will go to boosting operations in those countries. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A Nano competitor cannot be made in the US or Canada, but possibly in Brazil or Korea. If GM is going to make the car is Brazil or Korea, then they should do the development and production with private investments or money from the Brazilian or Korean governments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Production in a country that GM isn&#039;t in now is even more of an argument for private funding or funding from the host country.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wonder if the Nana competitor was part of the plan proposed by GM to the government? Doesn&#039;t seem likely since cars like this have very thin margins and it would be inconsistent with the plan to return to profitability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great cars for the US remains to be proven. GM doesn&#39;t have the reputation provided by a track record to support a belief in future success.</p>
<p>At this point, they are working with money from governments that are expecting that the taxpayer money spent will go to boosting operations in those countries. </p>
<p>A Nano competitor cannot be made in the US or Canada, but possibly in Brazil or Korea. If GM is going to make the car is Brazil or Korea, then they should do the development and production with private investments or money from the Brazilian or Korean governments.</p>
<p>Production in a country that GM isn&#39;t in now is even more of an argument for private funding or funding from the host country.</p>
<p>I wonder if the Nana competitor was part of the plan proposed by GM to the government? Doesn&#39;t seem likely since cars like this have very thin margins and it would be inconsistent with the plan to return to profitability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMfan87</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/08/18/gm-considering-tata-nano-competitor-for-emerging-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-611018</link>
		<dc:creator>GMfan87</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 03:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=38627#comment-611018</guid>
		<description>....global economy....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;GM has a great line-up planned for the US already, y not try to make some money where there isn&#039;t a stigma that goes along with the GM brands and people actually give their cars a chance....and (get this) like them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.global economy&#8230;.</p>
<p>GM has a great line-up planned for the US already, y not try to make some money where there isn&#39;t a stigma that goes along with the GM brands and people actually give their cars a chance&#8230;.and (get this) like them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zermatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/08/18/gm-considering-tata-nano-competitor-for-emerging-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-611017</link>
		<dc:creator>zermatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=38627#comment-611017</guid>
		<description>GM spends taxpayer money to develop products for emerging markets when they can&#039;t even make products for this market?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;GM - get the job done here first and then we can talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM spends taxpayer money to develop products for emerging markets when they can&#39;t even make products for this market?</p>
<p>GM &#8211; get the job done here first and then we can talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 272/273 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.egmcartech.com @ 2012-02-13 12:07:08 -->
