<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dodge Avenger could go RWD, Chrysler Sebring to move to Fiat platform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/07/20/dodge-avenger-could-go-rwd-chrysler-sebring-to-move-to-fiat-platform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/07/20/dodge-avenger-could-go-rwd-chrysler-sebring-to-move-to-fiat-platform/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dodge-avenger-could-go-rwd-chrysler-sebring-to-move-to-fiat-platform</link>
	<description>Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthew8487</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/07/20/dodge-avenger-could-go-rwd-chrysler-sebring-to-move-to-fiat-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-620711</link>
		<dc:creator>matthew8487</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=37006#comment-620711</guid>
		<description>Very nice post. This is good. But i prefer 2009 Chrysler Sebring Sedan Car. 2009 Chrysler is a perfect choice for regular user. It is available with two body style one is sedan and other is convertible. It is attractive and very comfortable as interiors are quite spacious. For more details refer &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.automotivecraze.com/2009-chrysler-sebring-sedan-car-review/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.automotivecraze.com/2009-chrysler-se...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice post. This is good. But i prefer 2009 Chrysler Sebring Sedan Car. 2009 Chrysler is a perfect choice for regular user. It is available with two body style one is sedan and other is convertible. It is attractive and very comfortable as interiors are quite spacious. For more details refer <a href="http://www.automotivecraze.com/2009-chrysler-sebring-sedan-car-review/" rel="nofollow">http://www.automotivecraze.com/2009-chrysler-se&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gus the grouter</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/07/20/dodge-avenger-could-go-rwd-chrysler-sebring-to-move-to-fiat-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-620712</link>
		<dc:creator>gus the grouter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=37006#comment-620712</guid>
		<description>Amazing, RWD is appealing AND achievable for volume models without premium price tags.  Seemingly they can also be put into the model mix and still comply with fuel efficiency regulations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you even understand any of this GM??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;RIP G8/Commodore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing, RWD is appealing AND achievable for volume models without premium price tags.  Seemingly they can also be put into the model mix and still comply with fuel efficiency regulations.</p>
<p>Do you even understand any of this GM??</p>
<p>RIP G8/Commodore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthew8487</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/07/20/dodge-avenger-could-go-rwd-chrysler-sebring-to-move-to-fiat-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-612777</link>
		<dc:creator>matthew8487</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 05:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=37006#comment-612777</guid>
		<description>Very nice post. This is good. But i prefer 2009 Chrysler Sebring Sedan Car. 2009 Chrysler is a perfect choice for regular user. It is available with two body style one is sedan and other is convertible. It is attractive and very comfortable as interiors are quite spacious. For more details refer &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.automotivecraze.com/2009-chrysler-sebring-sedan-car-review/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.automotivecraze.com/2009-chrysler-se...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice post. This is good. But i prefer 2009 Chrysler Sebring Sedan Car. 2009 Chrysler is a perfect choice for regular user. It is available with two body style one is sedan and other is convertible. It is attractive and very comfortable as interiors are quite spacious. For more details refer <a href="http://www.automotivecraze.com/2009-chrysler-sebring-sedan-car-review/" rel="nofollow">http://www.automotivecraze.com/2009-chrysler-se&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gus the grouter</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/07/20/dodge-avenger-could-go-rwd-chrysler-sebring-to-move-to-fiat-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-612778</link>
		<dc:creator>gus the grouter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 05:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=37006#comment-612778</guid>
		<description>Amazing, RWD is appealing AND achievable for volume models without premium price tags.  Seemingly they can also be put into the model mix and still comply with fuel efficiency regulations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you even understand any of this GM??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;RIP G8/Commodore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing, RWD is appealing AND achievable for volume models without premium price tags.  Seemingly they can also be put into the model mix and still comply with fuel efficiency regulations.</p>
<p>Do you even understand any of this GM??</p>
<p>RIP G8/Commodore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 257/258 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.egmcartech.com @ 2012-02-13 14:15:56 -->
