<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No more Dodge Ram diesel in the works, Chrysler cancels Cummins contract</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/06/19/no-more-dodge-ram-diesel-in-the-works-chrysler-cancels-cummins-contract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/06/19/no-more-dodge-ram-diesel-in-the-works-chrysler-cancels-cummins-contract/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=no-more-dodge-ram-diesel-in-the-works-chrysler-cancels-cummins-contract</link>
	<description>Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joebloggs10</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/06/19/no-more-dodge-ram-diesel-in-the-works-chrysler-cancels-cummins-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-620451</link>
		<dc:creator>joebloggs10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=35427#comment-620451</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s very disappointing that it seems that Chrysler and Ford are both giving up on a diesel model. I for one will not be buying a new truck this year because this short sighted move. &lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not alone in believing that this would be the ideal power source for the F150 or RAM 1500. &lt;br&gt;More torque better and better fuel economy who the hell wants that? These companies will go down the toilet with this short term outlook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s very disappointing that it seems that Chrysler and Ford are both giving up on a diesel model. I for one will not be buying a new truck this year because this short sighted move. <br />I&#39;m not alone in believing that this would be the ideal power source for the F150 or RAM 1500. <br />More torque better and better fuel economy who the hell wants that? These companies will go down the toilet with this short term outlook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joebloggs10</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/06/19/no-more-dodge-ram-diesel-in-the-works-chrysler-cancels-cummins-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-612118</link>
		<dc:creator>joebloggs10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=35427#comment-612118</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s very disappointing that it seems that Chrysler and Ford are both giving up on a diesel model. I for one will not be buying a new truck this year because this short sighted move. &lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not alone in believing that this would be the ideal power source for the F150 or RAM 1500. &lt;br&gt;More torque better and better fuel economy who the hell wants that? These companies will go down the toilet with this short term outlook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s very disappointing that it seems that Chrysler and Ford are both giving up on a diesel model. I for one will not be buying a new truck this year because this short sighted move. <br />I&#39;m not alone in believing that this would be the ideal power source for the F150 or RAM 1500. <br />More torque better and better fuel economy who the hell wants that? These companies will go down the toilet with this short term outlook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 227/228 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.egmcartech.com @ 2012-02-13 17:53:20 -->
