Comments on: Obama and Bush administration fighting over who is responsible for Chrysler, GM collapse

By: kabluey

kabluey — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:39:55 +0000

The government isn't suppose to run a private business, so how should the blame be put on a person that is to mainly look after national security.

GMFan is right! Corrupt unions, undue management, sorry-ass products, and a recession–as the cherry on top–make for a complete and utter disaster.

By: Dane

Dane — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:07:27 +0000

this is GM fault…. Bush chose to look the other way… How can O'Bama take the blame???

By: Chris

Chris — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:12:41 +0000

I like Obama but you can't blame Bush on this one, GM is to blame for putting itself in this position from the start. Bush wouldn't have given GM a dime if it wasn't for the Obama transition team. Either way, bankruptcy was obviously unavoidable.

By: Keyser Söze

Keyser Söze — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 01:25:07 +0000

How about decades and decades of making inferior products…could that be the cause? Sure Bush boy kicked the can to King Obama, Cheney himself admitted it last week.

By: GMfan87

GMfan87 — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:16:26 +0000

let me settle this for them:

#1 cause is……Unions!
#2 cause is……horrible management!
#3 cause is……recession!

the only way government can be at fault is for not disbanning unions a long time ago. even then, the poor management would have caught up to them eventually…..

awesome comment by the way zermatt lol

By: zermatt

zermatt — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:11:00 +0000

If you ask me, the cure is worse than the cause.

By: Steve

Steve — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:33:11 +0000

Yeah, like the problems started last year.

By: Flex

Flex — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:22:51 +0000

How could this be a fight?

Bush is the clear winner.
And all his money hungree, Phill Grahm buddies.