The Barack Obama administration and the former George Bush administration are in a battle of words over who is responsible for the collapse of Chrysler and General Motors.

According to the Obama economic advisor Austin Goolsbee, who spoke on Fox News last night, the Obama administration turned down a pitch last November from Bush’s administration to publicly join forces on setting tough conditions for GM and Chrysler in return for federal aid.

“We are only in this situation because somebody else kicked the can down the road, and that’s really an understatement,” Goolsbee said. ”When George Bush put money into General Motors, almost explicitly with the purpose, how many dollars do they need to stay alive until January 20th, 2009? There was no commitment to restructuring, to making these viable enterprises of any kind. I don’t know why the Bush administration simply handed them money and shoved the problem onto the next guy.”

Separately, former White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said in Politico that president Barack Obama had endorsed Bush’s decision to provide GM and Chrysler with $17.4 billion in aid. She said that if Obama’s administration had objected, GM and Chrysler most likely wouldn’t have gotten any federal loans.

 

“If the Obama transition team had not wanted us to provide breathing space for the automakers — with an express condition of future proven viability — they should have said so at the time, and those concerns would have been given considerable weight and may have changed the outcome,” Perino said. “It was, in fact, the new administration that decided last week to go whole hog and put taxpayers on the hook for a 60 percent stake in a company that has not proven in concrete terms how it will become viable in the future.”

Honestly, who cares now? What’s done is done and we’re here – let’s just hope we don’t end up here again. For the sake of argument, whose fault do you think it is?

- By: Omar Rana

Source: Free Press and Detroit News

 

Related Posts:

  1. Obama administration to cut compensations for top level executives at GM, Chrysler
  2. Obama administration ends warranty program for GM, Chrysler
  3. Obama administration: Chrysler and Fiat deal still has some hurdles to clear
  4. Obama praises Bush for auto loan, says automakers must end bad management practices
  5. Obama urges Bush to offer Big 3 immediate aid

  • kabluey
    The government isn't suppose to run a private business, so how should the blame be put on a person that is to mainly look after national security.

    GMFan is right! Corrupt unions, undue management, sorry-ass products, and a recession--as the cherry on top--make for a complete and utter disaster.
  • Dane
    this is GM fault.... Bush chose to look the other way... How can O'Bama take the blame???
  • Chris
    I like Obama but you can't blame Bush on this one, GM is to blame for putting itself in this position from the start. Bush wouldn't have given GM a dime if it wasn't for the Obama transition team. Either way, bankruptcy was obviously unavoidable.
  • Keyser Söze
    How about decades and decades of making inferior products...could that be the cause? Sure Bush boy kicked the can to King Obama, Cheney himself admitted it last week.
  • GMfan87
    let me settle this for them:

    #1 cause is......Unions!
    #2 cause is......horrible management!
    #3 cause is......recession!

    the only way government can be at fault is for not disbanning unions a long time ago. even then, the poor management would have caught up to them eventually.....

    awesome comment by the way zermatt lol
  • zermatt
    If you ask me, the cure is worse than the cause.
  • Yeah, like the problems started last year.
  • Flex
    How could this be a fight?


    Bush is the clear winner.
    And all his money hungree, Phill Grahm buddies.
blog comments powered by Disqus