<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama announces national fuel-economy standard at 35.5 mpg by 2016</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/05/19/obama-announces-national-fuel-economy-standard-at-355-mpg-by-2016/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/05/19/obama-announces-national-fuel-economy-standard-at-355-mpg-by-2016/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obama-announces-national-fuel-economy-standard-at-355-mpg-by-2016</link>
	<description>Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMfan87</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/05/19/obama-announces-national-fuel-economy-standard-at-355-mpg-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-623157</link>
		<dc:creator>GMfan87</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 07:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=34185#comment-623157</guid>
		<description>how exactly does increasing cafe standards by 8 mpg correlate to curbing oil dependence?  i agree with zermatt, reserves are going to run out far before we become completely independent of oil.  now increasing incentives for hydrogen infrastructure and more efficient lighter battery packs would be a real start IMO...hydrogen should be our ultimate goal&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and GM and Chysler failing would be a massive blow to the economy, more so than any oil independence would help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how exactly does increasing cafe standards by 8 mpg correlate to curbing oil dependence?  i agree with zermatt, reserves are going to run out far before we become completely independent of oil.  now increasing incentives for hydrogen infrastructure and more efficient lighter battery packs would be a real start IMO&#8230;hydrogen should be our ultimate goal</p>
<p>and GM and Chysler failing would be a massive blow to the economy, more so than any oil independence would help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zermatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/05/19/obama-announces-national-fuel-economy-standard-at-355-mpg-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-623158</link>
		<dc:creator>zermatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 06:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=34185#comment-623158</guid>
		<description>Neil,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;20 to 30 years is not even in the low end of the estimates of how long reserves will last. 40 years is the bottom end that I frequently see.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even at 20 years, the oil companies don&#039;t seem to be in any rush to keep themselves in business by creating new products that will replace the revenue they receive from oil. I would be surprised if Exxon would just close shop leaving all of their stock holders with zero equity? (No cracks about GM &amp; Chrysler)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,</p>
<p>20 to 30 years is not even in the low end of the estimates of how long reserves will last. 40 years is the bottom end that I frequently see.</p>
<p>Even at 20 years, the oil companies don&#39;t seem to be in any rush to keep themselves in business by creating new products that will replace the revenue they receive from oil. I would be surprised if Exxon would just close shop leaving all of their stock holders with zero equity? (No cracks about GM &#038; Chrysler)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil </title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/05/19/obama-announces-national-fuel-economy-standard-at-355-mpg-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-623156</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 03:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=34185#comment-623156</guid>
		<description>Zermatt &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Isn&#039;t the slightly longer term prospect of NO oil at all even darker. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I won&#039;t quote Clarkson from yesterday but he is one of the staunachest petrol heads in the entire world (I have been reading his artcles since 1984 in the british magazine PerformanceCar) and what he basically said was that we (manufacturers and users) have to accept that the Life-span of the internal combustion engine is coming to an end. &lt;br&gt;Whether 20 or 30 or 40 years from now it is going to happen and if it gets extended a little by better Fuel economy then that is a good thing&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now I agree the Recession wasn&#039;t caused by Oil but it certinaly isn&#039;t making the balance of trade any better. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And as for the big 3 in Detriot may be they shouldn&#039;t survive or GM and Chrysler at least</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zermatt </p>
<p>Isn&#39;t the slightly longer term prospect of NO oil at all even darker. </p>
<p>I won&#39;t quote Clarkson from yesterday but he is one of the staunachest petrol heads in the entire world (I have been reading his artcles since 1984 in the british magazine PerformanceCar) and what he basically said was that we (manufacturers and users) have to accept that the Life-span of the internal combustion engine is coming to an end. <br />Whether 20 or 30 or 40 years from now it is going to happen and if it gets extended a little by better Fuel economy then that is a good thing</p>
<p>Now I agree the Recession wasn&#39;t caused by Oil but it certinaly isn&#39;t making the balance of trade any better. </p>
<p>And as for the big 3 in Detriot may be they shouldn&#39;t survive or GM and Chrysler at least</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrystal K.</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/05/19/obama-announces-national-fuel-economy-standard-at-355-mpg-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-623153</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrystal K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=34185#comment-623153</guid>
		<description>This is a great idea.  Saving money on gas and saving gas is good for everyone (almost everyone).  I don&#039;t feel that this will decrease competition or demand for cars.  In fact it might even increase it, since car dealers will have to focus on other selling points decide MPG, to get consumer dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great idea.  Saving money on gas and saving gas is good for everyone (almost everyone).  I don&#39;t feel that this will decrease competition or demand for cars.  In fact it might even increase it, since car dealers will have to focus on other selling points decide MPG, to get consumer dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrystal K.</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/05/19/obama-announces-national-fuel-economy-standard-at-355-mpg-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-623154</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrystal K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=34185#comment-623154</guid>
		<description>This is a great idea.  Saving money on gas and saving gas is good for everyone (almost everyone).  I don&#039;t feel that this will decrease competition or demand for cars.  In fact it might even increase it, since car dealers will have to focus on other selling points decide MPG, to get consumer dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great idea.  Saving money on gas and saving gas is good for everyone (almost everyone).  I don&#39;t feel that this will decrease competition or demand for cars.  In fact it might even increase it, since car dealers will have to focus on other selling points decide MPG, to get consumer dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zermatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/05/19/obama-announces-national-fuel-economy-standard-at-355-mpg-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-623155</link>
		<dc:creator>zermatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 01:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=34185#comment-623155</guid>
		<description>Neil,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have to disagree. Timing is not good with the Detroit 3 having trouble selling enough cars to cover current costs, let alone to cover the cost of design and development. The question of compromises in safety and performance may out weigh the hoped for savings.What will be the consequences of not being able to meet these new standards? Will the only cars available on the market be small cars because the magic number could not be attained? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regardless of what vehicles will be available, the net result will be that people will hold onto their current vehicles longer because they really don&#039;t want small cars that are really expensive or are unsafe due to compromises for weight reduction. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Our recession is not due to a dependence on foreign oil and high gas prices were not the reason why Detroit has financial problems. If Detroit is to survive it will be by building cars that people want to buy and NOT by building cars that the government mandates.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you are an auto enthusiast we are moving into dark times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,</p>
<p>I have to disagree. Timing is not good with the Detroit 3 having trouble selling enough cars to cover current costs, let alone to cover the cost of design and development. The question of compromises in safety and performance may out weigh the hoped for savings.What will be the consequences of not being able to meet these new standards? Will the only cars available on the market be small cars because the magic number could not be attained? </p>
<p>Regardless of what vehicles will be available, the net result will be that people will hold onto their current vehicles longer because they really don&#39;t want small cars that are really expensive or are unsafe due to compromises for weight reduction. </p>
<p>Our recession is not due to a dependence on foreign oil and high gas prices were not the reason why Detroit has financial problems. If Detroit is to survive it will be by building cars that people want to buy and NOT by building cars that the government mandates.</p>
<p>If you are an auto enthusiast we are moving into dark times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMfan87</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/05/19/obama-announces-national-fuel-economy-standard-at-355-mpg-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-611470</link>
		<dc:creator>GMfan87</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=34185#comment-611470</guid>
		<description>how exactly does increasing cafe standards by 8 mpg correlate to curbing oil dependence?  i agree with zermatt, reserves are going to run out far before we become completely independent of oil.  now increasing incentives for hydrogen infrastructure and more efficient lighter battery packs would be a real start IMO...hydrogen should be our ultimate goal&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and GM and Chysler failing would be a massive blow to the economy, more so than any oil independence would help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how exactly does increasing cafe standards by 8 mpg correlate to curbing oil dependence?  i agree with zermatt, reserves are going to run out far before we become completely independent of oil.  now increasing incentives for hydrogen infrastructure and more efficient lighter battery packs would be a real start IMO&#8230;hydrogen should be our ultimate goal</p>
<p>and GM and Chysler failing would be a massive blow to the economy, more so than any oil independence would help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zermatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/05/19/obama-announces-national-fuel-economy-standard-at-355-mpg-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-611472</link>
		<dc:creator>zermatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 23:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=34185#comment-611472</guid>
		<description>Neil,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;20 to 30 years is not even in the low end of the estimates of how long reserves will last. 40 years is the bottom end that I frequently see.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even at 20 years, the oil companies don&#039;t seem to be in any rush to keep themselves in business by creating new products that will replace the revenue they receive from oil. I would be surprised if Exxon would just close shop leaving all of their stock holders with zero equity? (No cracks about GM &amp; Chrysler)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,</p>
<p>20 to 30 years is not even in the low end of the estimates of how long reserves will last. 40 years is the bottom end that I frequently see.</p>
<p>Even at 20 years, the oil companies don&#39;t seem to be in any rush to keep themselves in business by creating new products that will replace the revenue they receive from oil. I would be surprised if Exxon would just close shop leaving all of their stock holders with zero equity? (No cracks about GM &#038; Chrysler)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil </title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/05/19/obama-announces-national-fuel-economy-standard-at-355-mpg-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-611468</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=34185#comment-611468</guid>
		<description>Zermatt &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Isn&#039;t the slightly longer term prospect of NO oil at all even darker. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I won&#039;t quote Clarkson from yesterday but he is one of the staunachest petrol heads in the entire world (I have been reading his artcles since 1984 in the british magazine PerformanceCar) and what he basically said was that we (manufacturers and users) have to accept that the Life-span of the internal combustion engine is coming to an end. &lt;br&gt;Whether 20 or 30 or 40 years from now it is going to happen and if it gets extended a little by better Fuel economy then that is a good thing&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now I agree the Recession wasn&#039;t caused by Oil but it certinaly isn&#039;t making the balance of trade any better. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And as for the big 3 in Detriot may be they shouldn&#039;t survive or GM and Chrysler at least</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zermatt </p>
<p>Isn&#39;t the slightly longer term prospect of NO oil at all even darker. </p>
<p>I won&#39;t quote Clarkson from yesterday but he is one of the staunachest petrol heads in the entire world (I have been reading his artcles since 1984 in the british magazine PerformanceCar) and what he basically said was that we (manufacturers and users) have to accept that the Life-span of the internal combustion engine is coming to an end. <br />Whether 20 or 30 or 40 years from now it is going to happen and if it gets extended a little by better Fuel economy then that is a good thing</p>
<p>Now I agree the Recession wasn&#39;t caused by Oil but it certinaly isn&#39;t making the balance of trade any better. </p>
<p>And as for the big 3 in Detriot may be they shouldn&#39;t survive or GM and Chrysler at least</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrystal K.</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/05/19/obama-announces-national-fuel-economy-standard-at-355-mpg-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-611461</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrystal K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=34185#comment-611461</guid>
		<description>This is a great idea.  Saving money on gas and saving gas is good for everyone (almost everyone).  I don&#039;t feel that this will decrease competition or demand for cars.  In fact it might even increase it, since car dealers will have to focus on other selling points decide MPG, to get consumer dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great idea.  Saving money on gas and saving gas is good for everyone (almost everyone).  I don&#39;t feel that this will decrease competition or demand for cars.  In fact it might even increase it, since car dealers will have to focus on other selling points decide MPG, to get consumer dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrystal K.</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/05/19/obama-announces-national-fuel-economy-standard-at-355-mpg-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-611462</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrystal K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=34185#comment-611462</guid>
		<description>This is a great idea.  Saving money on gas and saving gas is good for everyone (almost everyone).  I don&#039;t feel that this will decrease competition or demand for cars.  In fact it might even increase it, since car dealers will have to focus on other selling points decide MPG, to get consumer dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great idea.  Saving money on gas and saving gas is good for everyone (almost everyone).  I don&#39;t feel that this will decrease competition or demand for cars.  In fact it might even increase it, since car dealers will have to focus on other selling points decide MPG, to get consumer dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zermatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/05/19/obama-announces-national-fuel-economy-standard-at-355-mpg-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-611466</link>
		<dc:creator>zermatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 18:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=34185#comment-611466</guid>
		<description>Neil,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have to disagree. Timing is not good with the Detroit 3 having trouble selling enough cars to cover current costs, let alone to cover the cost of design and development. The question of compromises in safety and performance may out weigh the hoped for savings.What will be the consequences of not being able to meet these new standards? Will the only cars available on the market be small cars because the magic number could not be attained? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regardless of what vehicles will be available, the net result will be that people will hold onto their current vehicles longer because they really don&#039;t want small cars that are really expensive or are unsafe due to compromises for weight reduction. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Our recession is not due to a dependence on foreign oil and high gas prices were not the reason why Detroit has financial problems. If Detroit is to survive it will be by building cars that people want to buy and NOT by building cars that the government mandates.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you are an auto enthusiast we are moving into dark times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,</p>
<p>I have to disagree. Timing is not good with the Detroit 3 having trouble selling enough cars to cover current costs, let alone to cover the cost of design and development. The question of compromises in safety and performance may out weigh the hoped for savings.What will be the consequences of not being able to meet these new standards? Will the only cars available on the market be small cars because the magic number could not be attained? </p>
<p>Regardless of what vehicles will be available, the net result will be that people will hold onto their current vehicles longer because they really don&#39;t want small cars that are really expensive or are unsafe due to compromises for weight reduction. </p>
<p>Our recession is not due to a dependence on foreign oil and high gas prices were not the reason why Detroit has financial problems. If Detroit is to survive it will be by building cars that people want to buy and NOT by building cars that the government mandates.</p>
<p>If you are an auto enthusiast we are moving into dark times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil </title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/05/19/obama-announces-national-fuel-economy-standard-at-355-mpg-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-611464</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=34185#comment-611464</guid>
		<description>Pat it is what we need right now&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The recession will end our dependence on foreign oil and the impact it has on our economy and the defeciet WON&#039;T unless changes are made. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My guess is Ford is going to be far away from this with current planned product introductions - Fiesta, Next Escape, Next Explorer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat it is what we need right now</p>
<p>The recession will end our dependence on foreign oil and the impact it has on our economy and the defeciet WON&#39;T unless changes are made. </p>
<p>My guess is Ford is going to be far away from this with current planned product introductions &#8211; Fiesta, Next Escape, Next Explorer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/05/19/obama-announces-national-fuel-economy-standard-at-355-mpg-by-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-611463</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=34185#comment-611463</guid>
		<description>no comment... honestly Obama? is this what we need right now!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no comment&#8230; honestly Obama? is this what we need right now!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 407/408 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.egmcartech.com @ 2012-02-13 13:32:56 -->
