President Barack Obama has announced new fuel-economy regulations in an attempt to reduce greenhouse gas pollution for all new cars and trucks sold in the United States. The standards will cover model years 2012-2016 and call for an average fuel-economy standard of 35.5 mpg by 2016 – an average increase of 8 mpg per vehicle.

The new regulations are projected to save 1.8 billion barrels of oil over the life of the program.

“In the past, an agreement such as this would have been considered impossible,” said President Obama. “That is why this announcement is so important, for it represents not only a change in policy in Washington, but the harbinger of a change in the way business is done in Washington. As a result of this agreement, we will save 1.8 billion barrels of oil over the lifetime of the vehicles sold in the next five years. And at a time of historic crisis in our auto industry, this rule provides the clear certainty that will allow these companies to plan for a future in which they are building the cars of the 21st century.”

“A national policy on fuel economy standards and greenhouse gas emissions is welcomed by the auto manufacturers because it provides regulatory certainty and predictability and includes flexibilities that will significantly reduce the cost of compliance,” said the White House in a statement. 

“The collaboration of federal agencies also allows for clearer rules for all automakers, instead of three standards (DOT, EPA and a state standard).”

Currently, DOT manages fuel-economy while the EPA measures emissions.

- By: Omar Rana

Photo Credit: Lawrence Jackson (Flickr)

Related Posts:

  1. Obama administration looking for 5% fuel economy annual gains through 2016
  2. Obama to unveil new fuel-economy standards tomorrow, calls for 35 mpg by 2016
  3. Obama administration raises fuel-economy regulations to 27.3 mpg by 2011
  4. New fuel-economy standard calls for 31.6mpg by 2015
  5. Hillary proposes 55mpg fuel-economy standard by 2030

  • This is a great idea. Saving money on gas and saving gas is good for everyone (almost everyone). I don't feel that this will decrease competition or demand for cars. In fact it might even increase it, since car dealers will have to focus on other selling points decide MPG, to get consumer dollars.
  • This is a great idea. Saving money on gas and saving gas is good for everyone (almost everyone). I don't feel that this will decrease competition or demand for cars. In fact it might even increase it, since car dealers will have to focus on other selling points decide MPG, to get consumer dollars.
  • Pat
    no comment... honestly Obama? is this what we need right now!?
  • Neil
    Pat it is what we need right now

    The recession will end our dependence on foreign oil and the impact it has on our economy and the defeciet WON'T unless changes are made.

    My guess is Ford is going to be far away from this with current planned product introductions - Fiesta, Next Escape, Next Explorer
  • zermatt
    Neil,

    I have to disagree. Timing is not good with the Detroit 3 having trouble selling enough cars to cover current costs, let alone to cover the cost of design and development. The question of compromises in safety and performance may out weigh the hoped for savings.What will be the consequences of not being able to meet these new standards? Will the only cars available on the market be small cars because the magic number could not be attained?

    Regardless of what vehicles will be available, the net result will be that people will hold onto their current vehicles longer because they really don't want small cars that are really expensive or are unsafe due to compromises for weight reduction.

    Our recession is not due to a dependence on foreign oil and high gas prices were not the reason why Detroit has financial problems. If Detroit is to survive it will be by building cars that people want to buy and NOT by building cars that the government mandates.

    If you are an auto enthusiast we are moving into dark times.
  • Neil
    Zermatt

    Isn't the slightly longer term prospect of NO oil at all even darker.

    I won't quote Clarkson from yesterday but he is one of the staunachest petrol heads in the entire world (I have been reading his artcles since 1984 in the british magazine PerformanceCar) and what he basically said was that we (manufacturers and users) have to accept that the Life-span of the internal combustion engine is coming to an end.
    Whether 20 or 30 or 40 years from now it is going to happen and if it gets extended a little by better Fuel economy then that is a good thing

    Now I agree the Recession wasn't caused by Oil but it certinaly isn't making the balance of trade any better.

    And as for the big 3 in Detriot may be they shouldn't survive or GM and Chrysler at least
  • GMfan87
    how exactly does increasing cafe standards by 8 mpg correlate to curbing oil dependence? i agree with zermatt, reserves are going to run out far before we become completely independent of oil. now increasing incentives for hydrogen infrastructure and more efficient lighter battery packs would be a real start IMO...hydrogen should be our ultimate goal

    and GM and Chysler failing would be a massive blow to the economy, more so than any oil independence would help
  • zermatt
    Neil,

    20 to 30 years is not even in the low end of the estimates of how long reserves will last. 40 years is the bottom end that I frequently see.

    Even at 20 years, the oil companies don't seem to be in any rush to keep themselves in business by creating new products that will replace the revenue they receive from oil. I would be surprised if Exxon would just close shop leaving all of their stock holders with zero equity? (No cracks about GM & Chrysler)
blog comments powered by Disqus