<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford would expect more from UAW if workers agree to deeper concessions with GM, Chrysler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/04/23/ford-would-expect-more-from-uaw-if-workers-agree-to-deeper-concessions-with-gm-chrysler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/04/23/ford-would-expect-more-from-uaw-if-workers-agree-to-deeper-concessions-with-gm-chrysler/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ford-would-expect-more-from-uaw-if-workers-agree-to-deeper-concessions-with-gm-chrysler</link>
	<description>Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zermatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/04/23/ford-would-expect-more-from-uaw-if-workers-agree-to-deeper-concessions-with-gm-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-623489</link>
		<dc:creator>zermatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=33399#comment-623489</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t sound like Ford got a most favored nations agreement with their recent agreement with the UAW and they are trying to negotiate one after the fact in public.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Something tells me that the UAW will say that they only accepted GM&#039;s &amp; Chrysler&#039;s terms under duress. Besides, the UAW will need a competitor of GM &amp; Chrysler to hold out as the minimum package they would accept upon the next renegotiation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#39;t sound like Ford got a most favored nations agreement with their recent agreement with the UAW and they are trying to negotiate one after the fact in public.</p>
<p>Something tells me that the UAW will say that they only accepted GM&#39;s &#038; Chrysler&#39;s terms under duress. Besides, the UAW will need a competitor of GM &#038; Chrysler to hold out as the minimum package they would accept upon the next renegotiation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zermatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/04/23/ford-would-expect-more-from-uaw-if-workers-agree-to-deeper-concessions-with-gm-chrysler/comment-page-1/#comment-612833</link>
		<dc:creator>zermatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=33399#comment-612833</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t sound like Ford got a most favored nations agreement with their recent agreement with the UAW and they are trying to negotiate one after the fact in public.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Something tells me that the UAW will say that they only accepted GM&#039;s &amp; Chrysler&#039;s terms under duress. Besides, the UAW will need a competitor of GM &amp; Chrysler to hold out as the minimum package they would accept upon the next renegotiation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#39;t sound like Ford got a most favored nations agreement with their recent agreement with the UAW and they are trying to negotiate one after the fact in public.</p>
<p>Something tells me that the UAW will say that they only accepted GM&#39;s &#038; Chrysler&#39;s terms under duress. Besides, the UAW will need a competitor of GM &#038; Chrysler to hold out as the minimum package they would accept upon the next renegotiation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 227/228 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.egmcartech.com @ 2012-02-13 15:25:38 -->
