GM is calling for plug-in vehicles standards that it says are necessary for consumer acceptance of electric-vehicles, like the Chevy Volt. The automaker will be supporting the Society of Automotive Engineers conference in Detroit next week, where the SAE J1772TM Task Force (they really couldn’t pick something easier) will continue to push for the standardization for the way a consumer plugs-in an electric-vehicle and charges the battery.

“In order for plug-in electric vehicles to become part of the mainstream, a plug-in ‘ecosystem’ must be in place when vehicles like the Chevy Volt extended-range electric vehicle hit the market.” writes Gery Kissel, an Energy Storage Systems Engineering Specialist at GM. ”And for this ecosystem to be robust, there must be commonality, especially when owners are plugging into the electrical grid.”

Kissel says that factors like outlet voltages and weather based on location will vary; however, we should have a standard for the charge cord and how a consumer uses it regardless of make or model.

“Drivers shouldn’t have to worry about electromagnetic compatibility, emission and immunity when they need to plug-in – that’s what engineers like me get paid to do.” 

Your thoughts? Have your say in the comments section below.

2011 Chevrolet Volt:

 

- By: Omar Rana

Source: GM’s FastLane Blog

Related Posts:

  1. GM’s other plug-in hybrid vehicles won’t have ‘Volt’ badging
  2. Detroit Electric partners with Proton to mass-produce electric-vehicles by 2012
  3. BMW and Daimler call for common electric-vehicle standards
  4. GM to Fed: Don’t count on Volt and plug-in hybrids when deciding mileage standards
  5. Smarlets: California company eyes electric charging stations for plug-in Volt

  • Jim
    Are we NOT in America? We have standards for electrical plug already. 110 and 220. Just use what we have. You buy a Volt. Take a trip and every place you stop you need to recharge. IF where you stop has upgraded their electrical grid!!!.. Use what we have. DO NOT ADD MORE EXPENSE TO AN ALREADY OVER PRICED PRODUCT.
  • zermatt
    What Kissel is really saying is: "We have throw up this smoke screen about industry standardization because we are so far behind and over budget on the development of the Vapor. Lord help us if the Government ever figures out we are squandering taxpayer money on this POS. The way we are spending taxpayer money on the Vapor, we make Bernie Madoff look like a petty thief!"
  • GMfan87
    why do you have such disdain for the volt? theres got to be something you like about it.
  • zermatt
    What I dislike about the Volt has to do with how GM has handled the publicity of the concept. The technology behind the Volt is an unproven engineering concept, yet GM has staked their entire recovery (or sucking up effort with Congress/Greens) on something that they haven't been able to prove will even work. Most manufacturers prove the concept is viable prior to making a big deal about what is in store for the future, but GM is unable to contain themselves.

    GM needs to slow down the publicity machine and get to making the car work. You cannot buy a dream any more than you can buy a Volt.

    I like to think of the Volt as the modern day Dale, a famous Green fraud from the mid 70's.
  • GMfan87
    The prius was an unproven technology before toyota started it in the 90's...I agree that they have over-publicized the volt. However, they needed that. They needed to catch the eye of the average american, and try to get rid of the stigma of being a car company that just produced big gas guzzlers. The volt was their ticket away from that persona. As for the technology, I've talked to an engineer working on the voltec platform and have heard first hand that this technology does exactly as they claim. Apparently there's a market for it too since the wait list is 30,000+ as of last fall. Granted that is an unofficial wait list, but even if 50% of those the pledged buy one, thats 3 times as many Volt sales, than the prius sold in its entire first year! So apparently the hype helped there as well. So in short the publicity was, IMO, a necessary (though annoying) evil...

    Isnt the Dale comparison just a little dramatic there...?
blog comments powered by Disqus