Chrysler’s CEO Bob Nardelli and president Tom LaSorda sent out a letter to Canadian employees on Friday, warning that if the 8,000 factory workers do not agree to pay cuts, Chrysler will no longer build vehicles in Canada.

Canadian Auto Workers (CAW) president Ken Lewenza responded to the letter calling it “an unprecedented and outrageous series of attacks on Canadian autoworkers and their union.”

You can read the letter after the jump and decide for yourself.

Click through for the full letter.

Dear Employees,

Today, we are at a crossroads in the history of Chrysler. Let’s take a look at what’s happened in the past few weeks.

On February 17 and February 20, Chrysler submitted its Viability Plan to the U.S. Treasury and U. S. Administration; and to the Canadian governments, respectively.

On March 30, U.S. President Barack Obama stated that Chrysler’s Viability Plan was unacceptable. “It’s with deep reluctance but also a clear-eyed recognition of the facts that we’ve determined, after careful review, that Chrysler needs a partner to remain viable.”

He went on to state: “I’m committed to doing all I can to see if a deal can be struck in a way that upholds the interests of American taxpayers. And that’s why we’ll give Chrysler and Fiat 30 days to overcome these hurdles and reach a final agreement — and we will provide Chrysler with adequate capital to continue operating during that time. If they are able to come to a sound agreement that protects American taxpayers, we will consider lending up to $6 billion to help their plan succeed. But if they and their stakeholders are unable to reach such an agreement, and in the absence of any other viable partnership, we will not be able to justify investing additional tax dollars to keep Chrysler in business.”

U.S. President Obama has made it clear that our company must attain competitive labour rates: “Now, what we’re asking for is difficult. It will require hard choices by companies. It will require unions and workers who have already made extraordinarily painful concessions to do more … It will require efforts from a whole host of other stakeholders, including dealers and suppliers.”

Also on March 30, the Honourable Tony Clement, Minister of Industry, said, “While the restructuring plans represent progress, they do not go far enough to ensure the long-term viability of these companies. Therefore, we are not certifying their proposals. Together with our U.S. counterparts we believe that further fundamental changes are needed.”

Just this week, Fiat CEO Sergio Marchionne has made it clear that an alliance is contingent on the UAW and CAW meeting transplant all-in labour rates: “Absolutely, we are prepared to walk. There is no doubt in my mind,” Marchionne was quoted as saying. “We cannot commit to this organization unless we see light at the end of the tunnel.”

The Canadian government has been very supportive of our viability, providing a loan of $1 billion (CDN, $750 million drawn to date), with an agreement to provide additional support in proportion to the loans received from the U.S. Treasury.

On April 14, the Canadian governments, both federal and provincial, invited the CAW and Chrysler to attend a meeting in Toronto where they laid out four specific guidelines that must be met for providing further financial support. Their “asks” were:
1. That labour costs be reduced to a level equal to those of Toyota Canada. We believe that a Canadian benchmark is the appropriate one for you to achieve. We ask that you jointly demonstrate to us that the agreement you reach attains this benchmark.
2. That Chrysler complete an alliance with Fiat that, in return for equity participation gives Chrysler access to Fiat management, Fiat technology, Fiat sales and distribution outside of NAFTA, and distribution of Fiat products inside NAFTA.
3. That Chrysler and Fiat submit revised plans to Canadian governments and U.S. Treasury based on appropriate assumptions that show clearly Canadian production, product mix, capital investment and R&D.
4. That Chrysler and Fiat commit to maintain Canada’s proportion of North American production and to invest over the medium term that same share of total capital investment and R&D expenditure in Canada.

Let’s keep in mind, the all-in labour costs at Chrysler Canada are $76 per hour while the Toyota Canada all-in rate is approximately $57 per hour.

While we have made some progress with the CAW, it falls significantly short of closing the $19 gap. And yet, as recent as Wednesday this week, the CAW continues to ignore this clear mandate from the government stating that they will not go any further. This unwillingness to work within the government’s guidelines jeopardizes the future of Chrysler and our operations in Canada.

We have made several proposals to the CAW to offset these costs, without affecting base wages and pensions. Some specific examples include:

Prescription drug dispensing fees, by eliminating the cap results in estimated savings of $2.16 per hour.

Elimination of out-of-province health care coverage (snowbirds), with employees and retirees assuming responsibility for any coverage results in a cost savings of $1.00 per hour.

The change from semi-private hospital room coverage to “ward” coverage saves an estimated tiny_XX.97 per hour.

Elimination of life insurance for current and future employees results in a cost savings of $1.54 per hour.

The reduction of shift premiums to 2.5 percent results in a cost savings of $.80 per hour.

By increasing health care premiums would save an estimated $1.04 per hour.

The elimination of non-traditional benefits such as child care, legal services, tuition reimbursement, dependant scholarships and extended health care coverage (chiropractic services, massage therapy, naturopath, orthotics, etc.) results in a cost savings of tiny_XX.73 per hour.

Unfortunately, the CAW has been opposed to these solutions – however, we are open to alternative ideas. Next week, we plan to meet with the CAW to attempt to reach an agreement that is acceptable to Fiat and the Canadian government.

The clock is running. Without labour concessions, Chrysler Canada’s manufacturing operations will not survive long-term. Thousands of good-paying jobs are in jeopardy, as well as the economic health of communities such as Windsor and Brampton.

Canada has always been an important manufacturing and sales market for Chrysler LLC. It represents the largest vehicle sales market for Chrysler outside of the U.S. and no other vehicle manufacturer has a larger portion of its total manufacturing in Canada than Chrysler.

However, these are not normal business circumstances and all Chrysler constituents have been asked to “break pattern” – employees, retirees, dealers, suppliers and others.

Time is very short. We have only two weeks before a final decision must be made. Let me be clear, our negotiations are about saving Chrysler Canada. We are coming down to the wire in the fight for our company’s survival – and we need your support.

Bob Nardelli
Tom LaSorda

- By: Omar Rana


Share |  Email  Print |

Tags: ,






Subscribe & Connect

Connect with us on any of our social profiles below.

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter to receive updates.

  • Dustin

    I hope they do leave, they're blackmailing Canadian Auto Workers like they blackmailed the Canadian Government. If they feel the need to threaten the CAW that they will cut out of Canada then they can just leave.

  • zermatt

    The CAW, like the UAW, is playing a game of chicken.

    It was interesting to see that Chrysler is offering to keep base wages the same and to protect the retirement benefits. Since Canada has socialized medicine, only moderate changes would be required to medical. The CAW has to give up other benefits that other companies just don't offer to their employees, yet this is too much for the CAW to give up. What a hoot – they don't want to give up their snow bird coverage.

    Rather than keep their jobs with fewer benefits, they would rather become unemployed?

    The union mentality is what drove jobs out of the U.S. and it is this neanderthal mind set that has to be eliminated so that the car companies can compete.

    Chrysler has over capacity for production and it might as well begin with eliminating plants in Canada.

  • gekke henkie

    @Dustin:
    Are you a Chrysler employee in Canada that is soon to loose his job? Probably not.

    We all know that if the CAW will not accept the same pay as employees from other car-companies get, Fiat will not sign the agreement, Obama will not loan them the billions, and Chrysler will be gone. So, what are the options of Chrysler, or, what do you want them to do? They have no choice other then to 'force' the CAW to either accept to give in (like everybody has to these days), or have the plants closed.

    Unfortunately, many employees in 'job security programs' in Canada are better of when they get unemployed, compared to keep working; this nonsense from the past should have never be possible IMHO.

  • GMfan87

    as usual you're right on the money….I wonder if the union workers realize what they're doing to their companies or are they just too used to getting their way to not care?

  • nukester99

    As a Canadian, I do not respond well to threats and coersion. If Chysler wishes to leave Canda, they should leave and I will “vote” with my wallet and NEVER consider buying a Chysler product again. I own one now, I have owned several in the past but to blackmail the workers, the Canadian government, they can just take their crappy American (and now French) attitudes and shove them up their collective agreements.

  • Neil

    Zermatt for president in 2012!!!!

  • Neil

    Zermatt for president in 2012!!!!

  • Rick Wag

    Freakin unions. Why do they think they should get better pay and benefits than workers from other auto companies especially when Chrysler is dying and producing subpar automobiles. Let them Chrysler go, I don't want anymore of my tax subsidizing other people's salaries for shitty products. 'Nuff said!

  • Rick Wag

    Yah, I hope they leave too. Hopefully to another country where they may produce cars at a lower cost and better quality! There's no point having to subsidize them so that they end up paying higher wages for crappy products.

  • John

    You are kidding right? Also as a Canadian, I do care for Canadian economy. At the same time, I can't think of many sectors/companies that pay better benefits than what GM and Chrysler employees get here especially given the type of work they do. Do they really think they can continue to get paid higher than Toyota and stay competitive? Many companies are now taking pay cuts. This is a difficult economy. Having a job in this condition is a privilege. Just talk to skilled people who lost their jobs and unable to find one.

    I for one, hope they stay in Canada. I hope they do negotiate a reasonable deal, and Chrysler produces competitive cars. I hope in the future, their cars will be on my list of potential buys.

  • GMfan87

    you list an op-ed as justification for tha auto-workers? read Zermatt's comment below, you're right that wages aren't the problem. It's the other concessions the auto companies made to the workers…

  • joe

    I thought the governments on both sides of the border said all stakeholders had to do their part. It seems it is only the workers who are giving up anything.

  • joe

    I thought the governments on both sides of the border said all stakeholders had to do their part. It seems it is only the workers who are giving up anything.