<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 180-hp Alfa Romeo MiTo Veloce to fit between base model and MiTo GTA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/20/180-hp-alfa-romeo-mito-veloce-to-fit-between-base-model-and-mito-gta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/20/180-hp-alfa-romeo-mito-veloce-to-fit-between-base-model-and-mito-gta/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=180-hp-alfa-romeo-mito-veloce-to-fit-between-base-model-and-mito-gta</link>
	<description>Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kabluey</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/20/180-hp-alfa-romeo-mito-veloce-to-fit-between-base-model-and-mito-gta/comment-page-1/#comment-618910</link>
		<dc:creator>kabluey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=32244#comment-618910</guid>
		<description>HAHA! I still can not believe that this will be sold at a Chrysler dealership.. ohhh.. lol..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHA! I still can not believe that this will be sold at a Chrysler dealership.. ohhh.. lol..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kabluey</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/20/180-hp-alfa-romeo-mito-veloce-to-fit-between-base-model-and-mito-gta/comment-page-1/#comment-608781</link>
		<dc:creator>kabluey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=32244#comment-608781</guid>
		<description>HAHA! I still can not believe that this will be sold at a Chrysler dealership.. ohhh.. lol..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHA! I still can not believe that this will be sold at a Chrysler dealership.. ohhh.. lol..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/20/180-hp-alfa-romeo-mito-veloce-to-fit-between-base-model-and-mito-gta/comment-page-1/#comment-608784</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=32244#comment-608784</guid>
		<description>The GTA is much better than a Ford Focus RS for a teen. it looks hotter..240-hp won&#039;t send them going crazy either</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GTA is much better than a Ford Focus RS for a teen. it looks hotter..240-hp won&#39;t send them going crazy either</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zermatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/20/180-hp-alfa-romeo-mito-veloce-to-fit-between-base-model-and-mito-gta/comment-page-1/#comment-608783</link>
		<dc:creator>zermatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=32244#comment-608783</guid>
		<description>The GTA is a car that I would consider to replace the teen&#039;s  Mini Cooper S. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would have preferred the Ford Focus RS, but since Ford won&#039;t import it.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GTA is a car that I would consider to replace the teen&#39;s  Mini Cooper S. </p>
<p>I would have preferred the Ford Focus RS, but since Ford won&#39;t import it&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 257/258 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.egmcartech.com @ 2012-02-13 14:20:23 -->
