<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buick and Jaguar dethrone Lexus for no.1 in J.D. Power and Associates Vehicle Dependability Survey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/19/buick-and-jaguar-dethrone-lexus-for-no1-in-jd-power-and-associates-vehicle-dependability-survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/19/buick-and-jaguar-dethrone-lexus-for-no1-in-jd-power-and-associates-vehicle-dependability-survey/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=buick-and-jaguar-dethrone-lexus-for-no1-in-jd-power-and-associates-vehicle-dependability-survey</link>
	<description>Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobmarley</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/19/buick-and-jaguar-dethrone-lexus-for-no1-in-jd-power-and-associates-vehicle-dependability-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-620432</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobmarley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=32191#comment-620432</guid>
		<description>I would like to see a study of vehicles with 90k - 200k miles. Those are the miles that really matter as far as dependability and resale value go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see a study of vehicles with 90k &#8211; 200k miles. Those are the miles that really matter as far as dependability and resale value go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beelzebub</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/19/buick-and-jaguar-dethrone-lexus-for-no1-in-jd-power-and-associates-vehicle-dependability-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-620433</link>
		<dc:creator>Beelzebub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=32191#comment-620433</guid>
		<description>Even Lexus fans saw this coming ... 2006 marked the decline when the new GS &amp; IS debuted w/ problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even Lexus fans saw this coming &#8230; 2006 marked the decline when the new GS &#038; IS debuted w/ problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdK</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/19/buick-and-jaguar-dethrone-lexus-for-no1-in-jd-power-and-associates-vehicle-dependability-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-620434</link>
		<dc:creator>EdK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=32191#comment-620434</guid>
		<description>I agree my 2008 Honda Accord had a lot of problems with engine and brakes.  The Japanese brands quality are no longer what is use to be. My next car will be  a Buick LaCross.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree my 2008 Honda Accord had a lot of problems with engine and brakes.  The Japanese brands quality are no longer what is use to be. My next car will be  a Buick LaCross.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mothra</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/19/buick-and-jaguar-dethrone-lexus-for-no1-in-jd-power-and-associates-vehicle-dependability-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-620435</link>
		<dc:creator>Mothra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=32191#comment-620435</guid>
		<description>ok wow.  I always thought Jags were @ the bottom of these lists.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will give it to GM &amp; Ford (not Chrysler) they have been really stepping up their game these past few years.  Honda/Toyota better watch out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok wow.  I always thought Jags were @ the bottom of these lists.  </p>
<p>I will give it to GM &#038; Ford (not Chrysler) they have been really stepping up their game these past few years.  Honda/Toyota better watch out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobmarley</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/19/buick-and-jaguar-dethrone-lexus-for-no1-in-jd-power-and-associates-vehicle-dependability-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-612143</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobmarley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=32191#comment-612143</guid>
		<description>I would like to see a study of vehicles with 90k - 200k miles. Those are the miles that really matter as far as dependability and resale value go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see a study of vehicles with 90k &#8211; 200k miles. Those are the miles that really matter as far as dependability and resale value go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beelzebub</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/19/buick-and-jaguar-dethrone-lexus-for-no1-in-jd-power-and-associates-vehicle-dependability-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-612144</link>
		<dc:creator>Beelzebub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=32191#comment-612144</guid>
		<description>Even Lexus fans saw this coming ... 2006 marked the decline when the new GS &amp; IS debuted w/ problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even Lexus fans saw this coming &#8230; 2006 marked the decline when the new GS &#038; IS debuted w/ problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdK</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/19/buick-and-jaguar-dethrone-lexus-for-no1-in-jd-power-and-associates-vehicle-dependability-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-612145</link>
		<dc:creator>EdK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=32191#comment-612145</guid>
		<description>I agree my 2008 Honda Accord had a lot of problems with engine and brakes.  The Japanese brands quality are no longer what is use to be. My next car will be  a Buick LaCross.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree my 2008 Honda Accord had a lot of problems with engine and brakes.  The Japanese brands quality are no longer what is use to be. My next car will be  a Buick LaCross.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mothra</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/19/buick-and-jaguar-dethrone-lexus-for-no1-in-jd-power-and-associates-vehicle-dependability-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-612146</link>
		<dc:creator>Mothra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=32191#comment-612146</guid>
		<description>ok wow.  I always thought Jags were @ the bottom of these lists.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will give it to GM &amp; Ford (not Chrysler) they have been really stepping up their game these past few years.  Honda/Toyota better watch out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok wow.  I always thought Jags were @ the bottom of these lists.  </p>
<p>I will give it to GM &#038; Ford (not Chrysler) they have been really stepping up their game these past few years.  Honda/Toyota better watch out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 317/318 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.egmcartech.com @ 2012-02-13 17:27:24 -->
