<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Geneva: 2010 Ford Ranger makes U.S. Ranger look like&#8230; crap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/04/2009-geneva-2010-ford-ranger-makes-us-ranger-look-like-crap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/04/2009-geneva-2010-ford-ranger-makes-us-ranger-look-like-crap/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=2009-geneva-2010-ford-ranger-makes-us-ranger-look-like-crap</link>
	<description>Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wallygator</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/04/2009-geneva-2010-ford-ranger-makes-us-ranger-look-like-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-620153</link>
		<dc:creator>Wallygator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=31613#comment-620153</guid>
		<description>The N.Amercan model is FAR better looking! This new European model is kinda girlie lookin IMO...Whatever happened to the rugged and masculine look of trucks? Why do they all have to look alien ie Tacoma or feminine ie Dakota They older models were far better looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The N.Amercan model is FAR better looking! This new European model is kinda girlie lookin IMO&#8230;Whatever happened to the rugged and masculine look of trucks? Why do they all have to look alien ie Tacoma or feminine ie Dakota They older models were far better looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wallygator</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/04/2009-geneva-2010-ford-ranger-makes-us-ranger-look-like-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-616298</link>
		<dc:creator>Wallygator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=31613#comment-616298</guid>
		<description>The N.Amercan model is FAR better looking! This new European model is kinda girlie lookin IMO...Whatever happened to the rugged and masculine look of trucks? Why do they all have to look alien ie Tacoma or feminine ie Dakota They older models were far better looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The N.Amercan model is FAR better looking! This new European model is kinda girlie lookin IMO&#8230;Whatever happened to the rugged and masculine look of trucks? Why do they all have to look alien ie Tacoma or feminine ie Dakota They older models were far better looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/04/2009-geneva-2010-ford-ranger-makes-us-ranger-look-like-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-609031</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 16:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=31613#comment-609031</guid>
		<description>Personly I don&#039;t like the look of that ranger. Looks like an explorer. Give me the 2009 sport style anytime over the max concept. If that the new look, they can keep the body,inside looks ok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personly I don&#39;t like the look of that ranger. Looks like an explorer. Give me the 2009 sport style anytime over the max concept. If that the new look, they can keep the body,inside looks ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kabluey</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/04/2009-geneva-2010-ford-ranger-makes-us-ranger-look-like-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-609032</link>
		<dc:creator>kabluey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=31613#comment-609032</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that they can sell the EU model for as cheap as the current one is sold for.. Subtract incentives from the price and an individual can have one of these for around $10K new--base of course..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t think that they can sell the EU model for as cheap as the current one is sold for.. Subtract incentives from the price and an individual can have one of these for around $10K new&#8211;base of course..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/04/2009-geneva-2010-ford-ranger-makes-us-ranger-look-like-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-609033</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=31613#comment-609033</guid>
		<description>Though only reason it would sell the best in the compact class is because of fleet sales. That doesn&#039;t mean its a profitable vehicle.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Tacoma is a far better pickup, all around and in every way. Ford could get the Ranger back on track by offering a new model in North America, but no, they will let the segment die down before they do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though only reason it would sell the best in the compact class is because of fleet sales. That doesn&#39;t mean its a profitable vehicle.</p>
<p>The Tacoma is a far better pickup, all around and in every way. Ford could get the Ranger back on track by offering a new model in North America, but no, they will let the segment die down before they do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Gutierrez</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/03/04/2009-geneva-2010-ford-ranger-makes-us-ranger-look-like-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-609034</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Gutierrez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=31613#comment-609034</guid>
		<description>As I&#039;ve said before, I actually prefer the conservative look of the NA Ranger, and there is no need to remodel it since it&#039;s still the best selling vehicle in its class. ha ha it really is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I&#39;ve said before, I actually prefer the conservative look of the NA Ranger, and there is no need to remodel it since it&#39;s still the best selling vehicle in its class. ha ha it really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 287/288 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.egmcartech.com @ 2012-02-13 16:51:43 -->
