<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chrysler says GM merger could be best option for survival</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/02/19/chrysler-says-gm-merger-could-be-best-option-for-survival/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/02/19/chrysler-says-gm-merger-could-be-best-option-for-survival/</link>
	<description>Breaking Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:24:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/02/19/chrysler-says-gm-merger-could-be-best-option-for-survival/comment-page-1/#comment-617911</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=30942#comment-617911</guid>
		<description>I am with you Ivan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What does the GM in eGM stand for&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I demand to know!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am with you Ivan</p>
<p>What does the GM in eGM stand for</p>
<p>I demand to know!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Gutierrez</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/02/19/chrysler-says-gm-merger-could-be-best-option-for-survival/comment-page-1/#comment-617912</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Gutierrez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=30942#comment-617912</guid>
		<description>So what exaclty does the &quot;eGM&quot; stand for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what exaclty does the &#8220;eGM&#8221; stand for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zermatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/02/19/chrysler-says-gm-merger-could-be-best-option-for-survival/comment-page-1/#comment-617916</link>
		<dc:creator>zermatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=30942#comment-617916</guid>
		<description>That is what GM is saying - $100 billion vs $45 billion to borrow more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Again, there is no guarantee that GM won&#039;t ask for more taxpayer money or that they won&#039;t make this a periodic begging routine - say every 3 to 6 months. They could also just file for bankruptcy after they have burned through any new cash injection.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is better to get it over with now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is what GM is saying &#8211; $100 billion vs $45 billion to borrow more.</p>
<p>Again, there is no guarantee that GM won&#39;t ask for more taxpayer money or that they won&#39;t make this a periodic begging routine &#8211; say every 3 to 6 months. They could also just file for bankruptcy after they have burned through any new cash injection.</p>
<p>It is better to get it over with now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/02/19/chrysler-says-gm-merger-could-be-best-option-for-survival/comment-page-1/#comment-617915</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=30942#comment-617915</guid>
		<description>they say Chapter 11 will cost more than what these companies are asking for</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they say Chapter 11 will cost more than what these companies are asking for</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/02/19/chrysler-says-gm-merger-could-be-best-option-for-survival/comment-page-1/#comment-617913</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=30942#comment-617913</guid>
		<description>If Chrysler were a boxer they would have called the fight a long time ago (TKO) if it wasn&#039;t for Jeep they would have been dead years ago.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I say Merge them - then go into Chapter 11 and basically dump everything except Chevy, Caddy, Jeep, Opel and Holden.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Caddy&#039;s can be rebaged as Buicks for China and a couple of Opel/holden sports sedans sold as Pontiacs in the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Chrysler were a boxer they would have called the fight a long time ago (TKO) if it wasn&#39;t for Jeep they would have been dead years ago.</p>
<p>I say Merge them &#8211; then go into Chapter 11 and basically dump everything except Chevy, Caddy, Jeep, Opel and Holden.</p>
<p>Caddy&#39;s can be rebaged as Buicks for China and a couple of Opel/holden sports sedans sold as Pontiacs in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zermatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/02/19/chrysler-says-gm-merger-could-be-best-option-for-survival/comment-page-1/#comment-617914</link>
		<dc:creator>zermatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=30942#comment-617914</guid>
		<description>Chapter 11 is the best alternative for Chrysler and GM.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;GM&#039;s leadership (if you want to call it that) has made some unrealistic assumptions in their bailout proposal that shows they have not caught onto the structural problems that they have with over capacity and shrinking market share. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chrysler is pretty much as clueless as GM. Assumptions that are far to optimistic and, like GM, leave the door open for the need to make requests for more money from the taxpayers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;GM estimates that it will tale $100 billion to do a chapter 11 reorganization (a amount I would guess to be inflated to have a fear inducing effect), but they are at $45 billion thus far between money received and money they are begging for now.  There certainly is no indication that they will not seek bankruptcy after they get another chunk of tax payer money or ask for additional funds. Why not just do the bankruptcy now and move forward?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is no way of know what Chrysler&#039;s market cap is, but GM&#039;s is only $1.26 billion. Throwing $45 billion at a company worth less than 1/20th of that amount does not make good fiscal sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chapter 11 is the best alternative for Chrysler and GM.</p>
<p>GM&#39;s leadership (if you want to call it that) has made some unrealistic assumptions in their bailout proposal that shows they have not caught onto the structural problems that they have with over capacity and shrinking market share. </p>
<p>Chrysler is pretty much as clueless as GM. Assumptions that are far to optimistic and, like GM, leave the door open for the need to make requests for more money from the taxpayers.</p>
<p>GM estimates that it will tale $100 billion to do a chapter 11 reorganization (a amount I would guess to be inflated to have a fear inducing effect), but they are at $45 billion thus far between money received and money they are begging for now.  There certainly is no indication that they will not seek bankruptcy after they get another chunk of tax payer money or ask for additional funds. Why not just do the bankruptcy now and move forward?</p>
<p>There is no way of know what Chrysler&#39;s market cap is, but GM&#39;s is only $1.26 billion. Throwing $45 billion at a company worth less than 1/20th of that amount does not make good fiscal sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/02/19/chrysler-says-gm-merger-could-be-best-option-for-survival/comment-page-1/#comment-612689</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=30942#comment-612689</guid>
		<description>I am with you Ivan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What does the GM in eGM stand for&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I demand to know!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am with you Ivan</p>
<p>What does the GM in eGM stand for</p>
<p>I demand to know!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Gutierrez</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/02/19/chrysler-says-gm-merger-could-be-best-option-for-survival/comment-page-1/#comment-612690</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Gutierrez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=30942#comment-612690</guid>
		<description>So what exaclty does the &quot;eGM&quot; stand for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what exaclty does the &#8220;eGM&#8221; stand for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zermatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/02/19/chrysler-says-gm-merger-could-be-best-option-for-survival/comment-page-1/#comment-612694</link>
		<dc:creator>zermatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=30942#comment-612694</guid>
		<description>That is what GM is saying - $100 billion vs $45 billion to borrow more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Again, there is no guarantee that GM won&#039;t ask for more taxpayer money or that they won&#039;t make this a periodic begging routine - say every 3 to 6 months. They could also just file for bankruptcy after they have burned through any new cash injection.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is better to get it over with now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is what GM is saying &#8211; $100 billion vs $45 billion to borrow more.</p>
<p>Again, there is no guarantee that GM won&#39;t ask for more taxpayer money or that they won&#39;t make this a periodic begging routine &#8211; say every 3 to 6 months. They could also just file for bankruptcy after they have burned through any new cash injection.</p>
<p>It is better to get it over with now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/02/19/chrysler-says-gm-merger-could-be-best-option-for-survival/comment-page-1/#comment-612693</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=30942#comment-612693</guid>
		<description>they say Chapter 11 will cost more than what these companies are asking for</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they say Chapter 11 will cost more than what these companies are asking for</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/02/19/chrysler-says-gm-merger-could-be-best-option-for-survival/comment-page-1/#comment-612691</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=30942#comment-612691</guid>
		<description>If Chrysler were a boxer they would have called the fight a long time ago (TKO) if it wasn&#039;t for Jeep they would have been dead years ago.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I say Merge them - then go into Chapter 11 and basically dump everything except Chevy, Caddy, Jeep, Opel and Holden.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Caddy&#039;s can be rebaged as Buicks for China and a couple of Opel/holden sports sedans sold as Pontiacs in the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Chrysler were a boxer they would have called the fight a long time ago (TKO) if it wasn&#39;t for Jeep they would have been dead years ago.</p>
<p>I say Merge them &#8211; then go into Chapter 11 and basically dump everything except Chevy, Caddy, Jeep, Opel and Holden.</p>
<p>Caddy&#39;s can be rebaged as Buicks for China and a couple of Opel/holden sports sedans sold as Pontiacs in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zermatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/02/19/chrysler-says-gm-merger-could-be-best-option-for-survival/comment-page-1/#comment-612692</link>
		<dc:creator>zermatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=30942#comment-612692</guid>
		<description>Chapter 11 is the best alternative for Chrysler and GM.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;GM&#039;s leadership (if you want to call it that) has made some unrealistic assumptions in their bailout proposal that shows they have not caught onto the structural problems that they have with over capacity and shrinking market share. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chrysler is pretty much as clueless as GM. Assumptions that are far to optimistic and, like GM, leave the door open for the need to make requests for more money from the taxpayers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;GM estimates that it will tale $100 billion to do a chapter 11 reorganization (a amount I would guess to be inflated to have a fear inducing effect), but they are at $45 billion thus far between money received and money they are begging for now.  There certainly is no indication that they will not seek bankruptcy after they get another chunk of tax payer money or ask for additional funds. Why not just do the bankruptcy now and move forward?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is no way of know what Chrysler&#039;s market cap is, but GM&#039;s is only $1.26 billion. Throwing $45 billion at a company worth less than 1/20th of that amount does not make good fiscal sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chapter 11 is the best alternative for Chrysler and GM.</p>
<p>GM&#39;s leadership (if you want to call it that) has made some unrealistic assumptions in their bailout proposal that shows they have not caught onto the structural problems that they have with over capacity and shrinking market share. </p>
<p>Chrysler is pretty much as clueless as GM. Assumptions that are far to optimistic and, like GM, leave the door open for the need to make requests for more money from the taxpayers.</p>
<p>GM estimates that it will tale $100 billion to do a chapter 11 reorganization (a amount I would guess to be inflated to have a fear inducing effect), but they are at $45 billion thus far between money received and money they are begging for now.  There certainly is no indication that they will not seek bankruptcy after they get another chunk of tax payer money or ask for additional funds. Why not just do the bankruptcy now and move forward?</p>
<p>There is no way of know what Chrysler&#39;s market cap is, but GM&#39;s is only $1.26 billion. Throwing $45 billion at a company worth less than 1/20th of that amount does not make good fiscal sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
