Comments on: 2010 Ford Mustang pricing starts at $20,995, 2010 Shelby GT500 starts at $46,325

By: waxner

waxner — Tue, 05 May 2009 10:52:22 +0000

One of the best on TTAC in recent times.Interesting car. Hope I drive one. If I do I’ll try to enjoy the heck out of it. Still like some other folk, it may not be my preference.

By: waxner

waxner — Tue, 05 May 2009 03:52:22 +0000

One of the best on TTAC in recent times.Interesting car. Hope I drive one. If I do I’ll try to enjoy the heck out of it. Still like some other folk, it may not be my preference.

By: Ivan Gutierrez

Ivan Gutierrez — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:26:08 +0000

Yeah I agree, I used to think that the 350Z was obsolete, at least for me, because I would rather take a Mustang GT, but now even as much as I like Ford, it looks like the tides have turned.

By: Pat

Pat — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:17:43 +0000

Camaro SS starts at 29,995 for the 422-hp SS and the Camaro 300-hp V6 starts at $22,995….. i think

By: Bobmarley

Bobmarley — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:01:33 +0000

The GT500 makes the base model look like poo. I think the V6 and GT/V8 need a little more power. A V6 mustang with only 210hp is on the weak side and if you wanna step up to the GT you have to throw down another $7k….and by then your in the 370z and 425hp camaro SS price range

By: Allen

Allen — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:36:33 +0000

Doesn't a 362hp Camaro start at $29,999? Yes its a little more than a grand over the price of the Mustang, but with a 47hp difference, not to mention the torque, and the weights of both cars being about the same, AND the Camaro actually having a decent suspension all around, I somehow don't see the value of a Mustang here.

It'd be better if Ford upped the displacement a little or gave it an small turbocharger (small enough to increase power, not big enough to induce turbo-lag) to up the power and fuel efficiency.