<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EPA rates 2010 Lexus RX 450h at 28 mpg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/01/09/epa-rates-2010-lexus-rx-450h-at-28-mpg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/01/09/epa-rates-2010-lexus-rx-450h-at-28-mpg/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=epa-rates-2010-lexus-rx-450h-at-28-mpg</link>
	<description>Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/01/09/epa-rates-2010-lexus-rx-450h-at-28-mpg/comment-page-1/#comment-618038</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=29567#comment-618038</guid>
		<description>Not to mention, according to fuel economy.gov, the last gen Highlander got 18/23 with V6 and 4WD...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention, according to fuel economy.gov, the last gen Highlander got 18/23 with V6 and 4WD&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/01/09/epa-rates-2010-lexus-rx-450h-at-28-mpg/comment-page-1/#comment-618040</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=29567#comment-618040</guid>
		<description>isn&#039;t this bigger than the highlander?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isn&#39;t this bigger than the highlander?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kabluey</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/01/09/epa-rates-2010-lexus-rx-450h-at-28-mpg/comment-page-1/#comment-618039</link>
		<dc:creator>Kabluey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=29567#comment-618039</guid>
		<description>Is that all??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The last generation Highlander got 28 with a V-6 and 4WD.. LAME!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that all??</p>
<p>The last generation Highlander got 28 with a V-6 and 4WD.. LAME!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/01/09/epa-rates-2010-lexus-rx-450h-at-28-mpg/comment-page-1/#comment-609237</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=29567#comment-609237</guid>
		<description>Not to mention, according to fuel economy.gov, the last gen Highlander got 18/23 with V6 and 4WD...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention, according to fuel economy.gov, the last gen Highlander got 18/23 with V6 and 4WD&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/01/09/epa-rates-2010-lexus-rx-450h-at-28-mpg/comment-page-1/#comment-609239</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=29567#comment-609239</guid>
		<description>isn&#039;t this bigger than the highlander?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isn&#39;t this bigger than the highlander?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kabluey</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2009/01/09/epa-rates-2010-lexus-rx-450h-at-28-mpg/comment-page-1/#comment-609238</link>
		<dc:creator>Kabluey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=29567#comment-609238</guid>
		<description>Is that all??&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The last generation Highlander got 28 with a V-6 and 4WD.. LAME!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that all??</p>
<p>The last generation Highlander got 28 with a V-6 and 4WD.. LAME!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 287/288 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.egmcartech.com @ 2012-02-13 05:59:28 -->
