<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BMW X4: A baby BMW X6 may be coming next year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/10/09/bmw-x4-a-baby-bmw-x6-may-be-coming-next-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/10/09/bmw-x4-a-baby-bmw-x6-may-be-coming-next-year/</link>
	<description>Breaking Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:31:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nobody Special</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/10/09/bmw-x4-a-baby-bmw-x6-may-be-coming-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-606843</link>
		<dc:creator>Nobody Special</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=26790#comment-606843</guid>
		<description>Why bother?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mean by itself  the design is pretty useless. BMW makes great cars and bikes, but away from the sedan styles (once they got rid of the 7 series trunk deck) they are totally out there; design for designs&#039; sake. Anyway, just why do they even bother with a back window? Are you really supposed to be able to see out of it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why bother?</p>
<p>I mean by itself  the design is pretty useless. BMW makes great cars and bikes, but away from the sedan styles (once they got rid of the 7 series trunk deck) they are totally out there; design for designs&#39; sake. Anyway, just why do they even bother with a back window? Are you really supposed to be able to see out of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zermatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/10/09/bmw-x4-a-baby-bmw-x6-may-be-coming-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-606844</link>
		<dc:creator>zermatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=26790#comment-606844</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get it. SUV style vehicles are on the way out and BMW is considering the introduction of yet another SUV in their line up? What next a pick up?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems to me that it would be better to have fewer SUVs and more cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t get it. SUV style vehicles are on the way out and BMW is considering the introduction of yet another SUV in their line up? What next a pick up?</p>
<p>It seems to me that it would be better to have fewer SUVs and more cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Gutierrez</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/10/09/bmw-x4-a-baby-bmw-x6-may-be-coming-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-606845</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Gutierrez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=26790#comment-606845</guid>
		<description>I think I speak for just about everyone when I say that BMW has taken their X# vehicles way too far.  These things just compete with themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I speak for just about everyone when I say that BMW has taken their X# vehicles way too far.  These things just compete with themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
