<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mercedes-Benz ConceptFASCINATION hints at next E-Class and CLK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/09/10/mercedes-benz-conceptfascination-hints-at-next-e-class-and-clk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/09/10/mercedes-benz-conceptfascination-hints-at-next-e-class-and-clk/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mercedes-benz-conceptfascination-hints-at-next-e-class-and-clk</link>
	<description>Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob </title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/09/10/mercedes-benz-conceptfascination-hints-at-next-e-class-and-clk/comment-page-1/#comment-621546</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 06:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=25819#comment-621546</guid>
		<description>I like it--very fierce looking.. without going where the new TL goes, lol.. To Fuglistan and back...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do think calling the CLK a &quot;C&quot; would help model image, since it costs more close to $50K than does a base C-Class of $32K... ELK doesn&#039;t sound that bad--but it wouldn&#039;t neccesarily have four doors...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it&#8211;very fierce looking.. without going where the new TL goes, lol.. To Fuglistan and back&#8230;</p>
<p>I do think calling the CLK a &#8220;C&#8221; would help model image, since it costs more close to $50K than does a base C-Class of $32K&#8230; ELK doesn&#39;t sound that bad&#8211;but it wouldn&#39;t neccesarily have four doors&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob </title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/09/10/mercedes-benz-conceptfascination-hints-at-next-e-class-and-clk/comment-page-1/#comment-612863</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=25819#comment-612863</guid>
		<description>I like it--very fierce looking.. without going where the new TL goes, lol.. To Fuglistan and back...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do think calling the CLK a &quot;C&quot; would help model image, since it costs more close to $50K than does a base C-Class of $32K... ELK doesn&#039;t sound that bad--but it wouldn&#039;t neccesarily have four doors...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it&#8211;very fierce looking.. without going where the new TL goes, lol.. To Fuglistan and back&#8230;</p>
<p>I do think calling the CLK a &#8220;C&#8221; would help model image, since it costs more close to $50K than does a base C-Class of $32K&#8230; ELK doesn&#39;t sound that bad&#8211;but it wouldn&#39;t neccesarily have four doors&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 227/228 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.egmcartech.com @ 2012-02-13 15:34:51 -->
