<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chrysler&#8217;s new mid-size sedan could be Fiat or Nissan Altima based</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/07/31/chryslers-new-mid-size-sedan-could-be-fiat-or-nissan-altima-based/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/07/31/chryslers-new-mid-size-sedan-could-be-fiat-or-nissan-altima-based/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=chryslers-new-mid-size-sedan-could-be-fiat-or-nissan-altima-based</link>
	<description>Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DadzBoyz</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/07/31/chryslers-new-mid-size-sedan-could-be-fiat-or-nissan-altima-based/comment-page-1/#comment-620242</link>
		<dc:creator>DadzBoyz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 01:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=24154#comment-620242</guid>
		<description>justmatt,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Avenger, Sebring, Sebring Convertible, Caliber, and Journey are all based on the Mitsubishi Lancer platform.  Three quarters of the way into development DaimlerChrysler (pre sell off) divested itself of it&#039;s Mitsubishi ownership.  In other words, they worked with Mitsu on the platform, sold off their share of the company, took the platform, and ran with it as their own.  Mitsubishi makes nothing from the platform as it was a &quot;joint&quot; development and the parties each kept their own versions.  Incidentally, from my understanding the extent of DaimlerChrysler&#039;s contribution to the development was the funding, not so much engineering.&lt;br&gt;So, what they&#039;re using now is, in essence, another companies platform which is what they are looking at doing now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>justmatt,</p>
<p>The Avenger, Sebring, Sebring Convertible, Caliber, and Journey are all based on the Mitsubishi Lancer platform.  Three quarters of the way into development DaimlerChrysler (pre sell off) divested itself of it&#39;s Mitsubishi ownership.  In other words, they worked with Mitsu on the platform, sold off their share of the company, took the platform, and ran with it as their own.  Mitsubishi makes nothing from the platform as it was a &#8220;joint&#8221; development and the parties each kept their own versions.  Incidentally, from my understanding the extent of DaimlerChrysler&#39;s contribution to the development was the funding, not so much engineering.<br />So, what they&#39;re using now is, in essence, another companies platform which is what they are looking at doing now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justmatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/07/31/chryslers-new-mid-size-sedan-could-be-fiat-or-nissan-altima-based/comment-page-1/#comment-620241</link>
		<dc:creator>justmatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=24154#comment-620241</guid>
		<description>I disagree.  The current car is such crap it needs to be canned.  Chyrsler has proven that they are only able to design one hit wonders (300, Neon, PT Crusier) and can not make a sustainable platform from which to develope and refine.  I do not think that the current models have Mitsu origins. I may be wrong, but I really don&#039;t think so.  I am pretty sure Mitsu would be in better health if that was the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree.  The current car is such crap it needs to be canned.  Chyrsler has proven that they are only able to design one hit wonders (300, Neon, PT Crusier) and can not make a sustainable platform from which to develope and refine.  I do not think that the current models have Mitsu origins. I may be wrong, but I really don&#39;t think so.  I am pretty sure Mitsu would be in better health if that was the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DadzBoyz</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/07/31/chryslers-new-mid-size-sedan-could-be-fiat-or-nissan-altima-based/comment-page-1/#comment-608717</link>
		<dc:creator>DadzBoyz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=24154#comment-608717</guid>
		<description>justmatt,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Avenger, Sebring, Sebring Convertible, Caliber, and Journey are all based on the Mitsubishi Lancer platform.  Three quarters of the way into development DaimlerChrysler (pre sell off) divested itself of it&#039;s Mitsubishi ownership.  In other words, they worked with Mitsu on the platform, sold off their share of the company, took the platform, and ran with it as their own.  Mitsubishi makes nothing from the platform as it was a &quot;joint&quot; development and the parties each kept their own versions.  Incidentally, from my understanding the extent of DaimlerChrysler&#039;s contribution to the development was the funding, not so much engineering.&lt;br&gt;So, what they&#039;re using now is, in essence, another companies platform which is what they are looking at doing now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>justmatt,</p>
<p>The Avenger, Sebring, Sebring Convertible, Caliber, and Journey are all based on the Mitsubishi Lancer platform.  Three quarters of the way into development DaimlerChrysler (pre sell off) divested itself of it&#39;s Mitsubishi ownership.  In other words, they worked with Mitsu on the platform, sold off their share of the company, took the platform, and ran with it as their own.  Mitsubishi makes nothing from the platform as it was a &#8220;joint&#8221; development and the parties each kept their own versions.  Incidentally, from my understanding the extent of DaimlerChrysler&#39;s contribution to the development was the funding, not so much engineering.<br />So, what they&#39;re using now is, in essence, another companies platform which is what they are looking at doing now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justmatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/07/31/chryslers-new-mid-size-sedan-could-be-fiat-or-nissan-altima-based/comment-page-1/#comment-608716</link>
		<dc:creator>justmatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=24154#comment-608716</guid>
		<description>I disagree.  The current car is such crap it needs to be canned.  Chyrsler has proven that they are only able to design one hit wonders (300, Neon, PT Crusier) and can not make a sustainable platform from which to develope and refine.  I do not think that the current models have Mitsu origins. I may be wrong, but I really don&#039;t think so.  I am pretty sure Mitsu would be in better health if that was the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree.  The current car is such crap it needs to be canned.  Chyrsler has proven that they are only able to design one hit wonders (300, Neon, PT Crusier) and can not make a sustainable platform from which to develope and refine.  I do not think that the current models have Mitsu origins. I may be wrong, but I really don&#39;t think so.  I am pretty sure Mitsu would be in better health if that was the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DadzBoyz</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/07/31/chryslers-new-mid-size-sedan-could-be-fiat-or-nissan-altima-based/comment-page-1/#comment-608715</link>
		<dc:creator>DadzBoyz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=24154#comment-608715</guid>
		<description>Using another company&#039;s platform.  That worked so well last time (i.e. the cars they are trying to replace).  They took the Lancer platform, that the EVO uses, and put the current garbage on top.  They need to develop their own flexible platform that they can use for B and C cars and small crossover SUV/SAV/whatever they&#039;re calleds.  If they use their own platform, it would make it a bit easier to incorporate that GE hybrid system that they announced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using another company&#39;s platform.  That worked so well last time (i.e. the cars they are trying to replace).  They took the Lancer platform, that the EVO uses, and put the current garbage on top.  They need to develop their own flexible platform that they can use for B and C cars and small crossover SUV/SAV/whatever they&#39;re calleds.  If they use their own platform, it would make it a bit easier to incorporate that GE hybrid system that they announced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 272/273 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.egmcartech.com @ 2012-02-13 13:36:19 -->
