<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Gear: 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X vs. 2008 Subaru WRX STI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/07/01/top-gear-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-evo-x-vs-2008-subaru-wrx-sti/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/07/01/top-gear-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-evo-x-vs-2008-subaru-wrx-sti/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=top-gear-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-evo-x-vs-2008-subaru-wrx-sti</link>
	<description>Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2010 STI</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/07/01/top-gear-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-evo-x-vs-2008-subaru-wrx-sti/comment-page-1/#comment-626196</link>
		<dc:creator>2010 STI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 03:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=22720#comment-626196</guid>
		<description>The fag needs to learn to drive. There is nothing wrong with the steering of the sti. WTF is a 14 year old setting up the cars in the first place. next time get a Formula 1 driver to test them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fag needs to learn to drive. There is nothing wrong with the steering of the sti. WTF is a 14 year old setting up the cars in the first place. next time get a Formula 1 driver to test them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cj</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/07/01/top-gear-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-evo-x-vs-2008-subaru-wrx-sti/comment-page-1/#comment-620707</link>
		<dc:creator>Cj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 14:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=22720#comment-620707</guid>
		<description>i have a correction... the sti has a 2.5 liter not a 2.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have a correction&#8230; the sti has a 2.5 liter not a 2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cj</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/07/01/top-gear-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-evo-x-vs-2008-subaru-wrx-sti/comment-page-1/#comment-611183</link>
		<dc:creator>Cj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 06:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=22720#comment-611183</guid>
		<description>i have a correction... the sti has a 2.5 liter not a 2.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have a correction&#8230; the sti has a 2.5 liter not a 2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NigNog</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/07/01/top-gear-2008-mitsubishi-lancer-evo-x-vs-2008-subaru-wrx-sti/comment-page-1/#comment-611184</link>
		<dc:creator>NigNog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=22720#comment-611184</guid>
		<description>Realize that the Evo is the FQ360 variant which is much faster and expensive! I wish he would have compared the &quot;regular&quot; Evo vs. the STi!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Realize that the Evo is the FQ360 variant which is much faster and expensive! I wish he would have compared the &#8220;regular&#8221; Evo vs. the STi!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 257/259 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.egmcartech.com @ 2012-02-13 14:57:58 -->
