<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chrysler announces pricing on 2009 Aspen and Durango Hybrids</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/06/17/chrysler-announces-pricing-on-2009-aspen-and-durango-hybrids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/06/17/chrysler-announces-pricing-on-2009-aspen-and-durango-hybrids/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=chrysler-announces-pricing-on-2009-aspen-and-durango-hybrids</link>
	<description>Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobmarley</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/06/17/chrysler-announces-pricing-on-2009-aspen-and-durango-hybrids/comment-page-1/#comment-621467</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobmarley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=22167#comment-621467</guid>
		<description>i agree, V8 hybrid is an oxymoron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree, V8 hybrid is an oxymoron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justmatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/06/17/chrysler-announces-pricing-on-2009-aspen-and-durango-hybrids/comment-page-1/#comment-621466</link>
		<dc:creator>justmatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=22167#comment-621466</guid>
		<description>Fine so it is $8000 cheaper then the comp.  Problem is $45,000 is still $8000 more then a non-hybrid Durango.  $8000 extra for an SUV that gets only 20mpg.  That is bad marketing.  I mentioned this before, the hybrid should be mated to a V-6.  People don&#039;t buy hybrids to show how manly they are, they are buy them to save on gas.  No-one wanting to save on gas is going to buy a SUV that gets 20mpg, especially having to cough up an extra $8000 to do it.  To make matters worse.  The going rate for an 2006 Durango in my area is $12,000.  I can only image the resale on a 2009 Hybrid Durango in 2011.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine so it is $8000 cheaper then the comp.  Problem is $45,000 is still $8000 more then a non-hybrid Durango.  $8000 extra for an SUV that gets only 20mpg.  That is bad marketing.  I mentioned this before, the hybrid should be mated to a V-6.  People don&#39;t buy hybrids to show how manly they are, they are buy them to save on gas.  No-one wanting to save on gas is going to buy a SUV that gets 20mpg, especially having to cough up an extra $8000 to do it.  To make matters worse.  The going rate for an 2006 Durango in my area is $12,000.  I can only image the resale on a 2009 Hybrid Durango in 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobmarley</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/06/17/chrysler-announces-pricing-on-2009-aspen-and-durango-hybrids/comment-page-1/#comment-615081</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobmarley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=22167#comment-615081</guid>
		<description>i agree, V8 hybrid is an oxymoron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree, V8 hybrid is an oxymoron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justmatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/06/17/chrysler-announces-pricing-on-2009-aspen-and-durango-hybrids/comment-page-1/#comment-615080</link>
		<dc:creator>justmatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=22167#comment-615080</guid>
		<description>Fine so it is $8000 cheaper then the comp.  Problem is $45,000 is still $8000 more then a non-hybrid Durango.  $8000 extra for an SUV that gets only 20mpg.  That is bad marketing.  I mentioned this before, the hybrid should be mated to a V-6.  People don&#039;t buy hybrids to show how manly they are, they are buy them to save on gas.  No-one wanting to save on gas is going to buy a SUV that gets 20mpg, especially having to cough up an extra $8000 to do it.  To make matters worse.  The going rate for an 2006 Durango in my area is $12,000.  I can only image the resale on a 2009 Hybrid Durango in 2011.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine so it is $8000 cheaper then the comp.  Problem is $45,000 is still $8000 more then a non-hybrid Durango.  $8000 extra for an SUV that gets only 20mpg.  That is bad marketing.  I mentioned this before, the hybrid should be mated to a V-6.  People don&#39;t buy hybrids to show how manly they are, they are buy them to save on gas.  No-one wanting to save on gas is going to buy a SUV that gets 20mpg, especially having to cough up an extra $8000 to do it.  To make matters worse.  The going rate for an 2006 Durango in my area is $12,000.  I can only image the resale on a 2009 Hybrid Durango in 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 257/258 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.egmcartech.com @ 2012-02-13 14:52:19 -->
