<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 Ford Mustang to look smaller</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/06/02/2010-ford-mustang-to-look-smaller/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/06/02/2010-ford-mustang-to-look-smaller/</link>
	<description>Breaking Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:31:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nic</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/06/02/2010-ford-mustang-to-look-smaller/comment-page-1/#comment-613222</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=21438#comment-613222</guid>
		<description>look an awful lot like a crossfire</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>look an awful lot like a crossfire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justmatt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/06/02/2010-ford-mustang-to-look-smaller/comment-page-1/#comment-613223</link>
		<dc:creator>justmatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=21438#comment-613223</guid>
		<description>This will most likely work very well for Ford.  People can laugh, but the Mustang II in the 70&#039;s sold very well, and the Fox platform Mustang kept tighter deminsions than Camaro and outsold it just about every year.  Ford knows they can always up the ante with bigger engines if the times dictate the need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will most likely work very well for Ford.  People can laugh, but the Mustang II in the 70&#39;s sold very well, and the Fox platform Mustang kept tighter deminsions than Camaro and outsold it just about every year.  Ford knows they can always up the ante with bigger engines if the times dictate the need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobmarley</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/06/02/2010-ford-mustang-to-look-smaller/comment-page-1/#comment-613224</link>
		<dc:creator>bobmarley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/?p=21438#comment-613224</guid>
		<description>Smart move by focomo, if this were a few years ago i would say its stupid to put a 4 or 6 cylander in a legendary muscle car but with gas prices so high it will easily counter the desired modern old school mucle car, and the power they can squeez out of a twin turbo V6 should do fine especially if its lighter and smaller. BUT this kind of change can ruin a cars image, maybe they should look into creating a new smaller sport car rather than messing with the mustang image</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smart move by focomo, if this were a few years ago i would say its stupid to put a 4 or 6 cylander in a legendary muscle car but with gas prices so high it will easily counter the desired modern old school mucle car, and the power they can squeez out of a twin turbo V6 should do fine especially if its lighter and smaller. BUT this kind of change can ruin a cars image, maybe they should look into creating a new smaller sport car rather than messing with the mustang image</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
