<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lutz: GM considering turbo four-cylinder Camaro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/03/19/lutz-gm-considering-turbo-four-cylinder-camaro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/03/19/lutz-gm-considering-turbo-four-cylinder-camaro/</link>
	<description>Breaking Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:33:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ghidrah</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/03/19/lutz-gm-considering-turbo-four-cylinder-camaro/comment-page-1/#comment-375828</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghidrah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/03/19/lutz-gm-considering-turbo-four-cylinder-camaro/#comment-375828</guid>
		<description>I realize it goes against the muscle car image but I think that a regular 4 banger should be offered as well.  In the 90s, I remember the Mustang/Camaro offered it.

w/ the new regulations, gas prices, being green ... etc etc ... I think that it would be a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize it goes against the muscle car image but I think that a regular 4 banger should be offered as well.  In the 90s, I remember the Mustang/Camaro offered it.</p>
<p>w/ the new regulations, gas prices, being green &#8230; etc etc &#8230; I think that it would be a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
