<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photo Renderings: 2010 BMW 5-Series</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/30/photo-renderings-2010-bmw-5-series/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/30/photo-renderings-2010-bmw-5-series/</link>
	<description>Breaking Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:33:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/30/photo-renderings-2010-bmw-5-series/comment-page-1/#comment-254500</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/30/photo-renderings-2010-bmw-5-series/#comment-254500</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s fantastic looking.  Too bad it&#039;s a Photoshop speculation, BMW&#039;s track record being what it is, I doubt the finished product will look that good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s fantastic looking.  Too bad it&#8217;s a Photoshop speculation, BMW&#8217;s track record being what it is, I doubt the finished product will look that good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/30/photo-renderings-2010-bmw-5-series/comment-page-1/#comment-250664</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/30/photo-renderings-2010-bmw-5-series/#comment-250664</guid>
		<description>Awesome.  Now this is more like what a BMW is supposed to look like. Smoother lines, lots of class. Maybe they&#039;ll get rid of the sunreflective paint, which dulls the car down too much.  Hard to believe Bangle did this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome.  Now this is more like what a BMW is supposed to look like. Smoother lines, lots of class. Maybe they&#8217;ll get rid of the sunreflective paint, which dulls the car down too much.  Hard to believe Bangle did this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/30/photo-renderings-2010-bmw-5-series/comment-page-1/#comment-249609</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/30/photo-renderings-2010-bmw-5-series/#comment-249609</guid>
		<description>And I do have to say, like the new 1 series this seems to be a little bit of a throw-back to before the Bangle BMWs, when they still had simpler, more minimalist styling and exuded sport.

Current BMW&#039;s just look bloated in the wrong places, and seem to slanted. 

Ich liebe dieser neu BMW, I&#039;ve decided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I do have to say, like the new 1 series this seems to be a little bit of a throw-back to before the Bangle BMWs, when they still had simpler, more minimalist styling and exuded sport.</p>
<p>Current BMW&#8217;s just look bloated in the wrong places, and seem to slanted. </p>
<p>Ich liebe dieser neu BMW, I&#8217;ve decided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/30/photo-renderings-2010-bmw-5-series/comment-page-1/#comment-249575</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/30/photo-renderings-2010-bmw-5-series/#comment-249575</guid>
		<description>I thought so, I mean we knew it was in the X6, no reason to not put it in the next-gen 5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought so, I mean we knew it was in the X6, no reason to not put it in the next-gen 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phoenexius</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/30/photo-renderings-2010-bmw-5-series/comment-page-1/#comment-249013</link>
		<dc:creator>phoenexius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/30/photo-renderings-2010-bmw-5-series/#comment-249013</guid>
		<description>The &#039;rumor&#039; of the engine:  there is a twin-turbo 4.4 V8 (400hp).  BMW showed it in Detroit 2008
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/21/detroit-2008-bmws-twin-turbo-4-4l-v8/2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;rumor&#8217; of the engine:  there is a twin-turbo 4.4 V8 (400hp).  BMW showed it in Detroit 2008<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/21/detroit-2008-bmws-twin-turbo-4-4l-v8/2" rel="nofollow">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/21/detroit-2008-bmws-twin-turbo-4-4l-v8/2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/30/photo-renderings-2010-bmw-5-series/comment-page-1/#comment-249008</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/30/photo-renderings-2010-bmw-5-series/#comment-249008</guid>
		<description>Hey! Bangle designed something that looks good. The hind quarters are not all messed up now (still worse than it could be but I like it better than currently), and we have a very nice front end.

Now just shave 400lbs out of the weight and increase fuel economy by a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! Bangle designed something that looks good. The hind quarters are not all messed up now (still worse than it could be but I like it better than currently), and we have a very nice front end.</p>
<p>Now just shave 400lbs out of the weight and increase fuel economy by a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
