http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/28/gm-to-fit-smaller-turbod-engines-in-future-cars/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=gm-to-fit-smaller-turbod-engines-in-future-cars Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:44:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/28/gm-to-fit-smaller-turbod-engines-in-future-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-239606 Kap Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:53:33 +0000 http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/28/gm-to-fit-smaller-turbod-engines-in-future-cars/#comment-239606 GM's 2.0 liter Ecotec turbo in the Sky Redline / Solstice GXP not only produces over 50% more power than the non-turbo 2.4 Ecotec in the standard Sky / Solstice, but it gets the same MPG city and 3 MORE highway. I think smaller DI/turbo motors will bring good things to Detroit engine bays. GM’s 2.0 liter Ecotec turbo in the Sky Redline / Solstice GXP not only produces over 50% more power than the non-turbo 2.4 Ecotec in the standard Sky / Solstice, but it gets the same MPG city and 3 MORE highway. I think smaller DI/turbo motors will bring good things to Detroit engine bays.

]]> http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/28/gm-to-fit-smaller-turbod-engines-in-future-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-239587 Allen Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:38:05 +0000 http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/28/gm-to-fit-smaller-turbod-engines-in-future-cars/#comment-239587 And post more comments people! And post more comments people!

]]> http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/28/gm-to-fit-smaller-turbod-engines-in-future-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-239585 Allen Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:36:14 +0000 http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/28/gm-to-fit-smaller-turbod-engines-in-future-cars/#comment-239585 It was already irrelevant, but its good to see US manufacturers dropping the 40 year old tag-lines for the sake of making decent powertrains again. It was already irrelevant, but its good to see US manufacturers dropping the 40 year old tag-lines for the sake of making decent powertrains again.

]]>