<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ready for a twin-turbo V6? Ford Mustang powertrains for 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/25/ready-for-a-twin-turbo-v6-ford-mustang-powertrains-for-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/25/ready-for-a-twin-turbo-v6-ford-mustang-powertrains-for-2010/</link>
	<description>Breaking Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:33:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joe walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/25/ready-for-a-twin-turbo-v6-ford-mustang-powertrains-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-278493</link>
		<dc:creator>joe walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/2008/01/25/ready-for-a-twin-turbo-v6-ford-mustang-powertrains-for-2010/#comment-278493</guid>
		<description>I like the looks of the proposed 2010 Mustang. I only hope that it will be available as a hatchback. Mustang has not offered a hatchback since the Fox bodies ended in 1993. 57% of all Fox body Mustangs were hatchbacks, so the demand is there. I will be one of the first to buy if it is a hatchback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the looks of the proposed 2010 Mustang. I only hope that it will be available as a hatchback. Mustang has not offered a hatchback since the Fox bodies ended in 1993. 57% of all Fox body Mustangs were hatchbacks, so the demand is there. I will be one of the first to buy if it is a hatchback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
