<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007 Hybrid cars losing fuel efficiency &#8211; Toyota Prius drops 20% in city mpg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.egmcartech.com/2007/02/26/2007-hybrid-cars-loosing-fuel-efficiency-toyota-prius-drops-20-in-city-mpg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2007/02/26/2007-hybrid-cars-loosing-fuel-efficiency-toyota-prius-drops-20-in-city-mpg/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=2007-hybrid-cars-loosing-fuel-efficiency-toyota-prius-drops-20-in-city-mpg</link>
	<description>Auto News, Car Reviews, Live Auto Show Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kohook1</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2007/02/26/2007-hybrid-cars-loosing-fuel-efficiency-toyota-prius-drops-20-in-city-mpg/comment-page-1/#comment-18830</link>
		<dc:creator>Kohook1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 17:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/2007/02/26/2007-hybrid-cars-loosing-fuel-efficiency-toyota-prius-drops-20-in-city-mpg/#comment-18830</guid>
		<description>EPA ratings are optimistic (higher than actual) for both gas and hybrid vehicles.  So the &quot;gross overstatement of government fuel economy numbers&quot; is neither here nor there because it doesn&#039;t say anything about the cost of hybrids compared to alternatives (e.g., conventional vehicles). 

In any case, I would bet a lot of money that the average Prius owner is much more intelligent than the average American.  Though HKaiser is right that monetary costs of a Prius vs a comparable car (4cyl Camry?) are higher, the observed preferences of Prius buyers strongly suggests that they receive utility from emitting less criteria pollutants (e.g., NOX, unburned hyrdocarbons) and GHG emissions whether or not they directly and personally benefit from cleaner air and/or lower risk of global warming.  That said, I would argue that they value the cache of a Prius as much as they do the decreased emissions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EPA ratings are optimistic (higher than actual) for both gas and hybrid vehicles.  So the &#8220;gross overstatement of government fuel economy numbers&#8221; is neither here nor there because it doesn&#8217;t say anything about the cost of hybrids compared to alternatives (e.g., conventional vehicles). </p>
<p>In any case, I would bet a lot of money that the average Prius owner is much more intelligent than the average American.  Though HKaiser is right that monetary costs of a Prius vs a comparable car (4cyl Camry?) are higher, the observed preferences of Prius buyers strongly suggests that they receive utility from emitting less criteria pollutants (e.g., NOX, unburned hyrdocarbons) and GHG emissions whether or not they directly and personally benefit from cleaner air and/or lower risk of global warming.  That said, I would argue that they value the cache of a Prius as much as they do the decreased emissions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HKaiser</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2007/02/26/2007-hybrid-cars-loosing-fuel-efficiency-toyota-prius-drops-20-in-city-mpg/comment-page-1/#comment-6953</link>
		<dc:creator>HKaiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/2007/02/26/2007-hybrid-cars-loosing-fuel-efficiency-toyota-prius-drops-20-in-city-mpg/#comment-6953</guid>
		<description>Loosing?  (Losing is the correct spelling).

&quot;Spare no expense to conserve,&quot; should be the slogan from the hybrid vehicle.  Given the average mathematical skill of the average American, I doubt most hybrid owners have calculated how much extra they actually must pay to own and operate a hybrid, even when using the EPA fuel economy ratings.  Given the gross overstatement of government fuel economy numbers, the hybrids are yet even more expensive!

Spare No Expense To Conserve!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loosing?  (Losing is the correct spelling).</p>
<p>&#8220;Spare no expense to conserve,&#8221; should be the slogan from the hybrid vehicle.  Given the average mathematical skill of the average American, I doubt most hybrid owners have calculated how much extra they actually must pay to own and operate a hybrid, even when using the EPA fuel economy ratings.  Given the gross overstatement of government fuel economy numbers, the hybrids are yet even more expensive!</p>
<p>Spare No Expense To Conserve!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon K. Hart</title>
		<link>http://www.egmcartech.com/2007/02/26/2007-hybrid-cars-loosing-fuel-efficiency-toyota-prius-drops-20-in-city-mpg/comment-page-1/#comment-6531</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon K. Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.egmcartech.com/2007/02/26/2007-hybrid-cars-loosing-fuel-efficiency-toyota-prius-drops-20-in-city-mpg/#comment-6531</guid>
		<description>Hybrids &quot;aren’t as effecient as they used to be?&quot; (&amp;they even mispeld). It at least irresponsible to stop at that comment. The cars are exactly as efficient, &amp; will get the same mileage as before the new test --it&#039;s only the gov&#039;t test that&#039;s changed (as it should have). The Detroit Free Press confused the map for the road... like looking at a new, smaller-scale map &amp; saying that the destination is closer today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hybrids &#8220;aren’t as effecient as they used to be?&#8221; (&amp;they even mispeld). It at least irresponsible to stop at that comment. The cars are exactly as efficient, &amp; will get the same mileage as before the new test &#8211;it&#8217;s only the gov&#8217;t test that&#8217;s changed (as it should have). The Detroit Free Press confused the map for the road&#8230; like looking at a new, smaller-scale map &amp; saying that the destination is closer today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 242/243 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.egmcartech.com @ 2012-02-13 15:13:24 -->
