Mazda and Honda Top the Reliability Survey

Mazda and Honda came out on top in a recent survey conducted by Warranty Direct, which stated Mazda and Honda cars suffer fewer mechanical faults than any other automaker. The survey was based on 450,000 cars from 33 automakers. Only 8.04% of Mazdas, between three and nine years old, were found to have mechanical failures making Mazda number one in reliability followed by Honda which had a rate of 8.90%. Infact the top three auto manufacturers that were found to be most reliablie were Asian automakers including Toyota. Of course, American cars were at the bottom of the list with mostly GM made cars. Check out the full list after the jump.

Fault Rates:

1. Mazda – 8.04%
2. Honda – 8.90%
3. Toyota – 15.78%
4. Mitsubishi – 17.04%
5. Kia – 17.39%
6. Subaru – 18.46%
7. Nissan – 18.86%
8. Lexus – 20.05%
9. Mini – 21.90%
10. Citroen – 25.98%
11. Daewoo – 26.30%
12. Hyundai – 26.36%
13. Peugeot – 26.59%
14. Ford – 26.76%
15. Suzuki – 27.20%
16. Porsche – 27.48%
17. Fiat – 28.49%
18. BMW – 28.64%
19. Vauxhall – 28.77%
20. Mercedes – 29.90%
21. Rover – 30.12%
22. Volvo – 31.28%
23. Volkswagen – 31.44%
24. Jaguar – 32.05%
25. Skoda – 32.12%
26. Chrysler – 34.90%
27. Audi – 36.74%
28. Seat – 36.87%
29. Renault – 36.87%
30. Alfa Romeo – 39.13%
31. Saab – 41.59%
32. Land Rover – 44.21%
33. Jeep – 46.36%


Share |  Email  Print |






Subscribe & Connect

Connect with us on any of our social profiles below.

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter to receive updates.

  • Luca

    Sorry, i can’t believe this survey. i own 3 GM cars and i had no mechanical problems at all during last 10. my friends with japanese cars had a lot, and those with Fiat were just in the middle. Now i don’t believe those surveys anymore since it’s clear it’s just a way japanese producer pay magazines to get good press or just to decide where to put money for their ads. sorry You are not believable anymore.

  • Phillip Ward

    Well I can surely believe this survey. I have had 7 hondas and 2 chevy suburbans. My brother has owned SEVERAL GM’s and never has them for longer than 3 years and still has little issues within the first three years. My Honda’s I keep them for about 150k miles and nothing actually goes wrong with the vehicle. All I do is the routine maintence and it’s all good. Now on the other hand my 2 suburbans my 98 had a starter solenoid go out at 60k miles and the exhaust donut needed replacement at 52k miles. On my 01 they had to do several suspension replacements because everytime I turned the suspension would POP. Luckliy I bought the extended warranty because that happened at around 38k miles. Not only that but I have had over 5 recalls on my suburban whereas I have only had 1 recall on my current honda.

    My brother bought an H2 and they had to replace the transmission because it was failing. His wife bought a chevy astro and traded it in within a year because within a year it started squeeking everywhere.

    The leather is also better made in my hondas than in my chevys. At around 90k miles my chevy leather starts wearing holes whereas my honda leather doesn’t show that same wear for about 150k.

    Don’t get me wrong I still like chevy products but the bottom line is that the honda product is just better built overall. If honda made a Suburban equivalent I would purchase that over the suburban for the wife because I know it would last longer and have a MUCH better resale.